48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-4262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy/Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Scramjet Combustor Flow Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the literature, the most preferred modeling cases are the HyperShot I&II [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and SCHOLAR [11][12][13][14][15][16], due a large degree to their relative complete data on experimental setup and measurements 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics for model validation. Simulations based on the experimental cases tested on some other scramjet combustor facilities, such as the DLR scramjet combustor [17,18], the University of Virginia's Supersonic Combustion Facility (SCF) [18][19][20][21] and the CUBRC Combustion Duct [22], are also growing vigorously. To date, promising work on modeling those experimental cases is still under way to validate the physical models and shock/turbulence capturing algorithms for supersonic combustion, as well as to improve the computational efficiency [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, the most preferred modeling cases are the HyperShot I&II [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and SCHOLAR [11][12][13][14][15][16], due a large degree to their relative complete data on experimental setup and measurements 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics for model validation. Simulations based on the experimental cases tested on some other scramjet combustor facilities, such as the DLR scramjet combustor [17,18], the University of Virginia's Supersonic Combustion Facility (SCF) [18][19][20][21] and the CUBRC Combustion Duct [22], are also growing vigorously. To date, promising work on modeling those experimental cases is still under way to validate the physical models and shock/turbulence capturing algorithms for supersonic combustion, as well as to improve the computational efficiency [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies using Configuration A [5], a nine-species Jachimowski model was used [12], and in a more recent work [6], a study was conducted comparing the Jachimowski results with another reaction model by O'Connaire [13]. Parallel to this work was an effort to capture the effects of combustor inflow turbulence by introducing artificial fluctuations at the inflow plane and sustaining them using a turbulence recycling / rescaling technique (described later in more detail).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting flux splitting scheme has been named the low-dissipation TVD scheme (LD-TVD) and further details of its implementation in this project can be found in [6]. The REACTMB code operates on the assumption of a mixture of thermally perfect gases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hybrid LES∕RANS approach developed at North Carolina State University (NC State) has been used extensively to study internal flows for scramjets, supersonic flow over flat plates and compression corners, and shock/boundary-layer interactions [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, these methods have not been previously validated for reentry-type problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%