2011
DOI: 10.1101/gr.114116.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large duplications at reciprocal translocation breakpoints that might be the counterpart of large deletions and could arise from stalled replication bubbles

Abstract: Reciprocal chromosome translocations are often not exactly reciprocal. Most familiar are deletions at the breakpoints, up to megabases in extent. We describe here the opposite phenomenon-duplication of tens or hundreds of kilobases at the breakpoint junction, so that the same sequence is present on both products of a translocation. When the products of the translocation are mapped on the genome, they overlap. We report several of these ''overlapping-breakpoint'' duplications in breast cancer cell lines HCC1187… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The replication-associated mechanism MMBIR can also generate alterations with multiple breakpoints (Hastings et al, 2009a). The lack of templated insertions at the breakpoint junctions, however, which are thought to result from abortive attempts to use another template during replication (Hastings et al, 2009b; Howarth et al, 2011), does not substantiate the involvement of a replication-associated rearrangement mechanism in the complex alterations we observed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The replication-associated mechanism MMBIR can also generate alterations with multiple breakpoints (Hastings et al, 2009a). The lack of templated insertions at the breakpoint junctions, however, which are thought to result from abortive attempts to use another template during replication (Hastings et al, 2009b; Howarth et al, 2011), does not substantiate the involvement of a replication-associated rearrangement mechanism in the complex alterations we observed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Switches at both diverging forks produces a head-to-head dimeric circle, which can be extracted and integrated into the chromosome to yield a symmetrical TID. Fork interactions at replication bubbles were also proposed to explain duplication by unequal translocation in human cancer cell lines (Howarth et al 2011). The formation of TID duplications has also been explained using a template-switching model that does not restrict template switches to replication fork regions (Hastings et al 2009b;Carvalho et al 2011).…”
Section: Ab Reams and Jr Rothmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two general models: (1) template switching at a DNA replication fork (FoSTeS/MMBIR) (Lee et al 2007;Hastings et al 2009a) or bubble (Howarth et al 2011); and (2) chromothripsis, which involves chromosome shattering followed by nonhomologous or microhomology-mediated end-joining (NHEJ/MMEJ) (Stephens et al 2011). There is evidence for both models.…”
Section: Cgrs Are Predominantly Formed By End-joiningmentioning
confidence: 99%