2009
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v14-719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Deviation Principle and Inviscid Shell Models

Abstract: A LDP is proved for the inviscid shell model of turbulence. As the viscosity coefficient ν converges to 0 and the noise intensity is multiplied by √ ν, we prove that some shell models of turbulence with a multiplicative stochastic perturbation driven by a H-valued Brownian motion satisfy a LDP in C([0, T ], V ) for the topology of uniform convergence on [0, T ], but where V is endowed with a topology weaker than the natural one. The initial condition has to belong to V and the proof is based on the weak conver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 3. 9 We point out that we have not proved that F C ∞ b is a core for the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup P t in L 1 µ ν , whereas we proved before (for any M ) that F C ∞ b is a core for the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup P M t in L 1 µ ν . The criterium of [30] used in the previous sections (with the quadratic term B M ) does not work for the operator K (with the "full" quadratic term B).…”
Section: This Implies (52) ✷mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Remark 3. 9 We point out that we have not proved that F C ∞ b is a core for the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup P t in L 1 µ ν , whereas we proved before (for any M ) that F C ∞ b is a core for the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup P M t in L 1 µ ν . The criterium of [30] used in the previous sections (with the quadratic term B M ) does not work for the operator K (with the "full" quadratic term B).…”
Section: This Implies (52) ✷mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Here, we present the details for the SABRA shell model (see [24]), but the same results hold for the GOY shell model (see [21,25]). In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in these fluid dynamical models, both for the deterministic and the stochastic case (see also [3,5,9,10]). From the analytic point of view as well as for numerical computations, they are easier to analyze than the Navier-Stokes or Euler equations.…”
Section: An Example: Shell Models Of Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth emphasizing that the presence of the stochastic term (noise) in these models often leads to qualitatively new types of behavior for the processes. Since the pioneering work of Bensoussan and Temam [4], there has been an extensive literature on stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with Wiener noise and related equations, we refer to [1], [2], [5], [6], [16], [19], [24], [42] amongst other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%