2015
DOI: 10.1177/0956797615612727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence

Abstract: A core hypothesis in developmental theory predicts that genetic influences on intelligence and academic achievement are suppressed under conditions of socioeconomic privation and more fully realized under conditions of socioeconomic advantage: a gene × childhood-socioeconomic status (G × SES) interaction. Tests of this hypothesis have produced apparently inconsistent results. We meta-analyzed tests of G × SES interaction on intelligence and academic achievement test scores, allowing for stratification by natio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
232
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(95 reference statements)
22
232
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have no objective account of parental occupation, the intrapair correlations of the self-reported measures indicated adequate reliability of the social class measure. Finally, we only used data from one country, Sweden, which may be a limitation as it was recently shown that that there are cross-national differences in gene-SES interactions (13). However, recent studies of older adults find no such differences between Scandinavia and the United States (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we have no objective account of parental occupation, the intrapair correlations of the self-reported measures indicated adequate reliability of the social class measure. Finally, we only used data from one country, Sweden, which may be a limitation as it was recently shown that that there are cross-national differences in gene-SES interactions (13). However, recent studies of older adults find no such differences between Scandinavia and the United States (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also evidence for genetic influences whereby the IQ of the adoptedaway children to some degree was correlated with their biological siblings' IQ. Furthermore, there is some evidence suggesting that the magnitude of genetic influences on IQ may vary across socioeconomic groups, where genetic influences are more important for variance in childhood IQ among children who grow up in socioeconomically privileged homes and environmental factors matter more for children who grow up in socioeconomically disadvantaged homes (12,13). These studies have predominantly focused on quantifying how genetic and environmental components of variance in cross-sectional cognitive data differ as a function of childhood SES but few have examined longitudinal cognitive change and SES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haworth et al, 2010;Polderman et al, 2015;Tucker-Drob & Bates, 2016) also supports the Gene-Gini interplay. Unlike numeracy and literacy, for which heritability remains stably high throughout the school system, heritability of IQ is moderate in primary school and continues to increase throughout education (Kovas et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A recent metaanalysis further supported this explanation in relation to intelligence and academic achievement (Tucker-Drob & Bates, 2016). The study examined differences in heritability between higher and lower SES groups within the US, Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK.…”
Section: Genes and Gini 13mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation