2021
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2020-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large contribution of pulsed subsidies to a predatory fish inhabiting large stream channels

Abstract: Resource subsidies exert critical influences on recipient habitats with relatively higher perimeter-to-area ratios, such as headwaters in watersheds. However, little is known about how those subsidies contribute to the energy sources in recipient habitats where the perimeter-to-area ratio is low, such as large stream channels. Here, we show that the diet of small Japanese eels <500 mm in total length inhabiting natural shoreline areas in large stream channels, consists largely of terrestrial earthworms. Sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effect of concrete revetment on the density of large Japanese eel (≥25.5 cm TL) has also been detected in the tidal zone of rivers in Kyushu, southern Japan (Matsushige, Yasutake & Mochioka, 2020). Bank revetment would lead to a reduced carrying capacity for Japanese eel through losses of their prey, such as small fishes, aquatic invertebrates, and terrestrial earthworms (Kawaguchi et al, 2006; Itakura et al, 2015; Itakura et al, 2021), as well as of eel habitat per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effect of concrete revetment on the density of large Japanese eel (≥25.5 cm TL) has also been detected in the tidal zone of rivers in Kyushu, southern Japan (Matsushige, Yasutake & Mochioka, 2020). Bank revetment would lead to a reduced carrying capacity for Japanese eel through losses of their prey, such as small fishes, aquatic invertebrates, and terrestrial earthworms (Kawaguchi et al, 2006; Itakura et al, 2015; Itakura et al, 2021), as well as of eel habitat per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any effects of pulsed prey supply on predators in our study were time-limited. In general, prey supplied pulse-wise are not regular food items for predators [3,31], and predators may be unable to accommodate these prey due to mismatches in, for example, foraging behaviour. Finally, our study highlights the importance of ‘ecosystem-based’ fisheries management strategies in which the effects of predator–prey interactions and intra- and interspecific competition on ecosystem structuring are taken into account [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous reports, any effects of pulsed prey supply on predators was short lived. In general, prey supplied pulse-wise are not regular food items for predators (e.g., Stephens et al 2019;Itakura et al 2021), and predators may be unable to accommodate these prey due to mismatches in foraging behavior or digestive ability. S2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%