2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.12900
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large conformal metrics with prescribed Gaussian and geodesic curvatures

Abstract: We consider the problem of prescribing Gaussian and geodesic curvatures for a conformal metric on the unit disk. This is equivalent to solving the following P.D.E.where K, h are the prescribed curvatures. We construct a family of conformal metrics with curvatures Kε, hε converging to K, h respectively as ε goes to 0, which blows up at one boundary point under some generic assumptions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…then the blow-up must occur at a critical point of ϕ(ξ) = H(ξ) + H(ξ) 2 + K(ξ), where H is the harmonic extension of κ. When finishing our writing the other day, we find that Battaglia-Medina-Pistoia [3] considered the inverse problem to [16]. They constructed a family of solutions with convergent curvatures K ε → K and κ ε → κ as ε goes to 0, which blows up at one boundary critical point of ϕ(ξ) under some non-degeneracy conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…then the blow-up must occur at a critical point of ϕ(ξ) = H(ξ) + H(ξ) 2 + K(ξ), where H is the harmonic extension of κ. When finishing our writing the other day, we find that Battaglia-Medina-Pistoia [3] considered the inverse problem to [16]. They constructed a family of solutions with convergent curvatures K ε → K and κ ε → κ as ε goes to 0, which blows up at one boundary critical point of ϕ(ξ) under some non-degeneracy conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that ε 2 K(x) and εκ(x) stand for the prescribed Gaussian curvature and the prescribed geodesic curvature of the boundary. We mention that the problem (2) is the perturbation case of zero curvatures, which do not be included in [3] and [16]. Note that the universal constant 1 is the original geodesic curvature of the boundary ∂D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%