2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large carnivore response to human road use suggests a landscape of coexistence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though diel activity is only one of many aspects of carnivore niche, our results indicate the functional diversity of diel activity among carnivores using roads was remarkably low and predictable. Concurrent with our study, GPS‐collared carnivores in our study area were primarily nocturnal near roads, but in areas farther from roads bobcats, coyotes, and wolves had roughly equal activity during day and night while bears were mostly diurnal (Kautz et al, 2021 ). We did not have a measure of how proximity to road affected fawn activity, but if fawns temporally avoided human activity near roads, it was evidently to a much lesser degree than carnivores did.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Though diel activity is only one of many aspects of carnivore niche, our results indicate the functional diversity of diel activity among carnivores using roads was remarkably low and predictable. Concurrent with our study, GPS‐collared carnivores in our study area were primarily nocturnal near roads, but in areas farther from roads bobcats, coyotes, and wolves had roughly equal activity during day and night while bears were mostly diurnal (Kautz et al, 2021 ). We did not have a measure of how proximity to road affected fawn activity, but if fawns temporally avoided human activity near roads, it was evidently to a much lesser degree than carnivores did.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…4th order of habitat selection 14 ), even if not avoided at a larger scale. To understand at which scale animals respond to recreation is therefore important for coexistence of humans and wildlife, as the ability to respond to recreation at the local scale 19 may mitigate disturbance effects at the home range scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within 100 m of the center point to identify locations that may increase the probability of capturing wildlife images. In some instances (n = 8), for example, because wildlife are known to use human trails and roads for travel 5 , 35 cameras were placed near or in the direction of recreational dirt roads and old overgrown conservation roads that are occasionally utilized by vehicles. Cameras were strapped 0.5 m 40 above the base of trees ± 30° of north to reduce direct sunlight 41 , and when possible, along linear features (e.g., river, trail, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, increasing temperatures and expanding urbanization have been postulated to reduce the time of hibernation, further increasing the number of bear-human conflicts along the urban-wildland interface 27 . Increased presence of human features on the landscape (e.g., roads) has resulted in bears increasing nocturnal activity, thus as humans drift farther into remote wild areas, particularly during annual bear hunting seasons, larger circadian shifts in black bear temporal activity may be expected 8 , 9 , 35 . Human hunters acting as top predators are restricted in their predation to specific areas and times of the day and year in which hunting is allowed, thus black bears may respond with spatial and temporal variation 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%