2007
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-07-08786-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large cardinals with few measures

Abstract: Abstract. We show, assuming the consistency of one measurable cardinal, that it is consistent for there to be exactly κ + many normal measures on the least measurable cardinal κ. This answers a question of Stewart Baldwin. The methods generalize to higher cardinals, showing that the number of λ strong compactness or λ supercompactness measures on P κ (λ) can be exactly λ + if λ > κ is a regular cardinal. We conclude with a list of open questions. Our proofs use a critical observation due to James Cummings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will take this opportunity to discuss a generalization of Hamkins’ Gap Forcing Theorem 6, 8 (as it is stated in 1), as its results are used extensively throughout this paper. A forcing notion \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathbb {P}}$\end{document} (and the forcing extension to which it gives rise) admits a closure point at δ if it factors as \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathbb Q}\,{*}\,\dot{{\mathbb R}}$\end{document}, where \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathbb Q}$\end{document} is nontrivial, \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$|{\mathbb Q}| \le \delta$\end{document}, and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\Vdash _{\mathbb Q}``\dot{{\mathbb R}}$\end{document} is δ‐strategically closed.” Our arguments will rely on the following consequence of the main result of 10.…”
Section: The Coding Oraclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will take this opportunity to discuss a generalization of Hamkins’ Gap Forcing Theorem 6, 8 (as it is stated in 1), as its results are used extensively throughout this paper. A forcing notion \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathbb {P}}$\end{document} (and the forcing extension to which it gives rise) admits a closure point at δ if it factors as \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathbb Q}\,{*}\,\dot{{\mathbb R}}$\end{document}, where \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathbb Q}$\end{document} is nontrivial, \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$|{\mathbb Q}| \le \delta$\end{document}, and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\Vdash _{\mathbb Q}``\dot{{\mathbb R}}$\end{document} is δ‐strategically closed.” Our arguments will rely on the following consequence of the main result of 10.…”
Section: The Coding Oraclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, we use an argument due to Cummings, which also appears in the proof of the Main Theorem of [4] and the proof of Lemma 2.1 of [2]. First, note that by our assumptions on V , V "κ carries exactly κ ++ = 2 2 κ many normal measures".…”
Section: The Proofs Of Theorems 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the classical result (see [11]) that if κ is 2 [λ] <κ supercompact, then P κ (λ) carries exactly 2 2 [λ] <κ many κ-additive, fine, normal measures (the maximal number), and the more recent results of [4] that when λ ≥ κ is regular, it is consistent relative to the appropriate assumptions for κ to be λ supercompact and for P κ (λ) to carry fewer than the maximal number of κ-additive, fine, normal measures, not much has been known concerning models for supercompactness and the number of normal measures P κ (λ) can carry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To do this, we use a new method due to James Cummings, which appears in [5] in a broader context. We isolate Cummings' techniques in the following lemma, which we state in a slightly generalized form.…”
Section: The Proofs Of Theorems 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%