2016
DOI: 10.1086/688894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Brains, Small Guts: The Expensive Tissue Hypothesis Supported within Anurans

Abstract: Brain size differs substantially among species, and several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of brain size. Because the brain is among the most energetically expensive organs in the vertebrate body, trade-offs have been hypothesized to exert constraints on brain size evolution. Prominently, the expensive tissue hypothesis (ETH) proposes that reducing the size of another expensive organ, such as the gut, should compensate for the cost of a large brain. But energetic constraints may also dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have shown that there is an energetic tradeoff between brain size and other energetically expensive organs and processes [2,11,13]. However, many of these studies focused on animals with small to medium encephalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have shown that there is an energetic tradeoff between brain size and other energetically expensive organs and processes [2,11,13]. However, many of these studies focused on animals with small to medium encephalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct metabolic constraints hypothesis predicts an increase in total basal metabolic rate (BMR) to pay for the energetic cost of a larger brain [5], whereas the energetic trade-off hypothesis predicts that the energetic cost of a large brain is met by reducing energy allocation to other expensive organs or functions [6,7]. Some studies in mammals have found evidence in support of the direct metabolic constraints hypothesis [5,[8][9][10], but other studies have found trade-offs between gut size and brain size in primates [6], anurans [11] and different lineages of fish [2,12], and between locomotor costs and brain mass in birds [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 48 h, we randomly selected 10 active females and 10 active males. Individuals were transferred to the laboratory and kept individually in a rectangular tank (0.5 m × 0.4 m × 0.4 m; Chahua, Fujian, China), and then killed by single-pithing [43,44,45,46,47]. We measured the body size (snout-vent length: SVL) of each individual to the nearest 0.01 mm with a calliper (SHANGGOMG, Shanghai, China).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and frogs (Liao et al. ), in addition to fat storage in pipefish and mammals (Tsuboi et al. ; Pontzer et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Liao et al. ) due to differences in regard to metabolic oxygen consumption of the central nervous system. Ectotherms’ brain tissue is as costly as that of homeotherms (Mink et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%