42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-1340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Area Spray Cooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system level critical heat flux for the large surface area was over 50 W/cm 2 for this spray condition at 275.7 kPa with FC-72™. This number compares well with published data for large area systems containing more nozzles per spray area [9]. As mentioned previously, the heat flux is dependent on the spray conditions in addition to the available flow rate determined by the number of nozzles which was kept to a minimum due to cost and complexity for this design.…”
Section: Spray Cooling System Performancementioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system level critical heat flux for the large surface area was over 50 W/cm 2 for this spray condition at 275.7 kPa with FC-72™. This number compares well with published data for large area systems containing more nozzles per spray area [9]. As mentioned previously, the heat flux is dependent on the spray conditions in addition to the available flow rate determined by the number of nozzles which was kept to a minimum due to cost and complexity for this design.…”
Section: Spray Cooling System Performancementioning
confidence: 63%
“…A spray cooling system was selected for this application since spray cooling takes advantage of an atomized spray impingement on the heated surface as well as the potential for heat transfer from the latent heat of vaporization resulting from a phase change of the working fluid from liquid to vapor. Spray cooling systems with phase change have the capability of achieving heat fluxes upwards of 100 W/cm 2 for Fluorinerts and 1000 W/cm 2 for water [9,10].…”
Section: Thermal Management Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin and Ponnappan [21] investigated the critical heat flux of various fluids including FC-72, FC-87, methanol, and water. Lin et al [22,23] examined orientation effects (heated surface both vertical and horizontal with the spray facing upward) of a 48-nozzle array using in which a 5% increase in critical heat flux, in the horizontal surface case, over the vertical heated surface was demonstrated. Lin et al [24] explored the spray cooling performance of a binary fluid (50% methanol and 50% water) to reduce the freezing point of water to −40 • C while maintaining convective performance near that of water.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin and Ponnappan [21] investigated CHF of various fluids including FC-72, FC-87, methanol, and water. Lin and Ponnappan [22] and Lin et al [23] examined orientation effects (heated surfaces, both vertical and horizontal, with the spray facing upward) of a 48-nozzle array using FC-72, in which a 5% increase in CHF, in the horizontal-surface case, over the vertical heated surface was demonstrated. Lin et al [24] explored the spray cooling performance of a binary fluid (50% methanol and 50% water) to reduce the freezing point of water to 40 C while maintaining convective performance near that of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%