2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Area Atomically Flat Surfaces via Exfoliation of Bulk Bi2Se3 Single Crystals

Abstract: In this work, we present an exfoliation method that produces cm2-area atomically flat surfaces from bulk layered single crystals, with broad applications such as for the formation of lateral heterostructures and for use as substrates for van der Waals epitaxy. Single crystals of Bi2Se3 were grown using the Bridgman method and examined with X-ray reciprocal space maps, Auger spectroscopy, low-energy electron diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. An indium-bonding exfoliation technique was developed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate the exfoliation energy of the surface QL, which is under the largest strain considered, as the difference between the energy per surface unit area of the full strained slab and that of the two isolated subsystems (one composed by the first 12 QLs and the other composed by only the surface QL). The difference is 13.0meV Å −2 , of the same order as 22.4meV Å −2 , previously reported for the exfoliation energy of unstrained Bi 2 Se 3 [42]. On the other hand, the energy per surface unit area required to expand Bi 2 Se 3 along the (0001) direction up to a 12.7% strain is obtained as the energy difference between the unstrained bulk and that of the bulk with c=32.0Å, divided by the surface area.…”
Section: Bi 2 Se 3 (0001) Thin Films Under a Strain Gradientsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We estimate the exfoliation energy of the surface QL, which is under the largest strain considered, as the difference between the energy per surface unit area of the full strained slab and that of the two isolated subsystems (one composed by the first 12 QLs and the other composed by only the surface QL). The difference is 13.0meV Å −2 , of the same order as 22.4meV Å −2 , previously reported for the exfoliation energy of unstrained Bi 2 Se 3 [42]. On the other hand, the energy per surface unit area required to expand Bi 2 Se 3 along the (0001) direction up to a 12.7% strain is obtained as the energy difference between the unstrained bulk and that of the bulk with c=32.0Å, divided by the surface area.…”
Section: Bi 2 Se 3 (0001) Thin Films Under a Strain Gradientsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Van der Waals (vdW) layered materials have served as electrodes, thermoelectrics, optoelectronics, substrates, and as precursors for 2D materials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The chemistry of known vdW materials is diverse, ranging from simple unaries and binaries (e.g. graphite, SnSe, Bi 2 Te 3 ) to complex multinaries (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the cleavage energy of the monolayer ZrTe 5 was calculated to be 0.21 J/m 2 (see Figure 1c), which is in agreement with the previous results. 38 This value is not only significantly lower than that of 2D Tl Bi 2 Se 3 (0.44 J/m 2 ) 39 but also comparable to that of graphene (0.15 J/m 2 ), 40 suggesting that it can be easily exfoliated from its bulk phase due to the low cleavage energy. The calculated phonon spectra indicated that the monolayer ZrTe 5 is dynamically stable because there is no imaginary frequency in the whole Brillouin zone, as shown in Figure 1d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%