2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-area (64 cm2), semi-transparent, flexible all-solid-state supercapacitor using D-bar coating process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured energy and power densities of the supercapacitor are 0.453 μWh/cm 2 and 26.5 mW/cm 2 . These values are better or comparable with the previously published PEDOT:PSS-based wearable supercapacitors, for example, RuO 2 /PEDOT:PSS spray-coated thin electrode (0.053 μWh/cm 2 , 0.147 mW/cm 2 ), PEDOT:PSS coated on cloth (0.074 μWh/cm 2 , 0.031 mW/cm 2 ), PEDOT:PSS fibers (4.13 μWh/cm 2 , 0.25 mW/cm 2 ), and other related devices are given for comparison in a Ragone plot (Figure ). The Ragone plot reveals that when the thickness is controlled, our technique brings the advantages of high power density with an area control on the device with the up-scalability property.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The measured energy and power densities of the supercapacitor are 0.453 μWh/cm 2 and 26.5 mW/cm 2 . These values are better or comparable with the previously published PEDOT:PSS-based wearable supercapacitors, for example, RuO 2 /PEDOT:PSS spray-coated thin electrode (0.053 μWh/cm 2 , 0.147 mW/cm 2 ), PEDOT:PSS coated on cloth (0.074 μWh/cm 2 , 0.031 mW/cm 2 ), PEDOT:PSS fibers (4.13 μWh/cm 2 , 0.25 mW/cm 2 ), and other related devices are given for comparison in a Ragone plot (Figure ). The Ragone plot reveals that when the thickness is controlled, our technique brings the advantages of high power density with an area control on the device with the up-scalability property.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result suggests that the SF-SC device based on ME-TCE possessed a higher rate capability. [35,36] The noticeably higher C a in the ME-TCE-based device relative to the PEDOT:PSS-based device arises primarily from the IR-drop, which is caused by the linear resistance. [37] For instance, the IRdrops in devices based on PEDOT:PSS and ME-TCE were 0.35 and 0.07 V, respectively; this confirms that the latter device has a lower internal resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, solution processing is intricately related to the crystallization and orientation of the film, which are important factors in functional device applications; hence, this process is appropriate for fabricating high-performance LC devices; this approach is also cost-effective, is easily controlled, and has low-temperature processing properties compared with other methods. Solution processing includes the spin-coating, bar-coating, blade-coating, dip-coating, and brush-coating methods. Specifically, the brush-coating method can help control the directionality of the liquid material used in the process by shearing the solution and orienting the particles successfully; thus, it assists in the formation of oriented micro/nanostructures on the coated surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%