2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.809121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LAPped in Proof: LC3‐Associated Phagocytosis and the Arms Race Against Bacterial Pathogens

Abstract: Cells of the innate immune system continuously patrol the extracellular environment for potential microbial threats that are to be neutralized by phagocytosis and delivery to lysosomes. In addition, phagocytes employ autophagy as an innate immune mechanism against pathogens that succeed to escape the phagolysosomal pathway and invade the cytosol. In recent years, LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) has emerged as an intermediate between phagocytosis and autophagy. During LAP, phagocytes target extracellular micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody staining against the Outer Surface Protein A (OspA) of B. burgdorferi showed coiled, DAPI positive spirochetes in the macrophage cytoplasm, as well as a punctate, DAPI negative OspA staining indicative of bacterial destruction. B. burgdorferi OspA also colocalized with the autophagy marker p62/Sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1), suggesting spirochete degradation via macrophage autophagy and/or LC3-associated phagocytosis pathways (7476). Collectively, these data indicate that B. burgdorferi are taken up by murine macrophages and sensed by the cGAS-STING pathway for engagement of IFN-I responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody staining against the Outer Surface Protein A (OspA) of B. burgdorferi showed coiled, DAPI positive spirochetes in the macrophage cytoplasm, as well as a punctate, DAPI negative OspA staining indicative of bacterial destruction. B. burgdorferi OspA also colocalized with the autophagy marker p62/Sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1), suggesting spirochete degradation via macrophage autophagy and/or LC3-associated phagocytosis pathways (7476). Collectively, these data indicate that B. burgdorferi are taken up by murine macrophages and sensed by the cGAS-STING pathway for engagement of IFN-I responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LC3 associated phagocytosis (LAP) is a receptor-mediated phagocytosis that utilizes some components of the autophagy machinery to process extracellular cargo (Grijmans et al, 2022; Heckmann and Green, 2019; Sanjuan et al, 2007). Dectin-1 mediated LAP has been demonstrated in phagocytosis of fungi by professional phagocytes such as macrophages and dendritic cells (Ma et al, 2012; Tam et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to distinct virulence factors, some bacterial pathogens can evade the destruction in the phagosome, either by re-modulation of the phagosomal milieu or via escape into the cytosol. Activation of LAP, a highly microbicidal non-canonical autophagy pathway ( Herb et al., 2020 ; Grijmans et al., 2022 ), enhances the degradative capacity of macrophages. We recently described another non-canonical autophagy pathway termed PINCA ( Gluschko et al., 2021 ), which is triggered by perforation of bacteria-containing phagosomes, independent of the ULK complex components ULK1/2 and FIP200 and also independent of Nox2-derived ROS, therefore representing a non-canonical autophagy pathway distinct from LAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors, like vacuolar-type H + -ATPase (V-ATPase)-mediated acidification ( Sun-Wada et al., 2009 ; Dragotakes et al., 2020 ; Westman and Grinstein, 2021 ), production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) ( Craig and Slauch, 2009 ; Slauch, 2011 ; Wink et al., 2011 ; Herb and Schramm, 2021 ) and exposure to hydrolases after fusion with lysosomes ( del Cerro-Vadillo et al., 2006 ; Schramm et al., 2014 ; Weiss and Schaible, 2015 ) lead to the formation of a highly antimicrobial environment for engulfed pathogens and, in most cases, result in their degradation ( Haas, 2007 ). However, several bacterial pathogens have established strategies to evade this degradative fate in the phagosome ( Mitchell et al., 2016 ; Grijmans et al., 2022 ), e.g. Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ) ( Fraunholz and Sinha, 2012 ; Moldovan and Fraunholz, 2019 ; Rao et al., 2020 ), Salmonella typhimurium ( S. typhimurium ) ( Eriksson et al., 2003 ; Fenlon and Slauch, 2014 ; Burton et al., 2014 ; Rhen, 2019 ; Rao et al., 2020 ) or Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Queval et al., 2017 ; Koster et al., 2017 ), which can alter the phagosomal composition and structure for their benefit and do not only remain unharmed, but also replicate inside the phagosome.…”
Section: Phagocytosis: Main Weapon Of Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%