2020
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.2975405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laplacian Redecomposition for Multimodal Medical Image Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primacy of the proposed method for CT–MR image fusion is highlighted by comparing its qualitative and quantitative performance with existing state‐of‐the‐art medical image fusion methods such as NSCT–PCNN by Das and Kundu [13], NSST–PCNN‐based medical image fusion proposed by Gupta [22], the sparse representation‐based method by Liu et al [33], parameter adaptive parameter adaptive pulse coupled neural network (PAPCNN)–NSST method by Yin et al [31], convolutional neural network‐based method proposed by Liu et al [34] and SD activated PCNN method in the NSCT domain presented by Li and Zhao [14]. Furthermore, to compare the fusion performance of the MR–SPECT neurological images, three recently developed image fusion methods such as the NSST domain bounded measure PCNN‐based method given by Tan et al [23], NSST‐domain weighted parameter adaptive dual‐channel PCNN‐based method by Panigrahy et al [32] and Laplacian re‐decomposition‐based fusion approach proposed by Li et al [7] are also considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The primacy of the proposed method for CT–MR image fusion is highlighted by comparing its qualitative and quantitative performance with existing state‐of‐the‐art medical image fusion methods such as NSCT–PCNN by Das and Kundu [13], NSST–PCNN‐based medical image fusion proposed by Gupta [22], the sparse representation‐based method by Liu et al [33], parameter adaptive parameter adaptive pulse coupled neural network (PAPCNN)–NSST method by Yin et al [31], convolutional neural network‐based method proposed by Liu et al [34] and SD activated PCNN method in the NSCT domain presented by Li and Zhao [14]. Furthermore, to compare the fusion performance of the MR–SPECT neurological images, three recently developed image fusion methods such as the NSST domain bounded measure PCNN‐based method given by Tan et al [23], NSST‐domain weighted parameter adaptive dual‐channel PCNN‐based method by Panigrahy et al [32] and Laplacian re‐decomposition‐based fusion approach proposed by Li et al [7] are also considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 and 14, it can also be visualised that the method proposed by Tan et al [23] does not preserve the structural details well and also results in over enhancement of the functional information which shows visual inconsistency in some regions of the fused images. The method proposed by Li et al [7] helps to preserve the anatomical information along with the limited reflection of colour information in the resultant images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The robustness of the proposed metrics on the gray-scale and pseudo color medical image fusion is discussed using three recent image fusion methods, namely, information of interest in local Laplacian filtering domain (II-LLF) [62], phase congruency and local Laplacian energy in NSCT domain (PC-LLE-NSCT) [63], and Laplacian re-decomposition (LRD) [64]. In II-LLF, LLF is first applied to source images, then the fused approximate image is obtained using a maximum local energy (MLE) rule whereas the fused residual images are generated by an information of interest based scheme and MLE rule.…”
Section: B Computational Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%