2018
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006655.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer

Abstract: of findings for the main comparison. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer Patient or population: adult women diagnosed with early stage (I to IIa) endometrial cancer undergoing surgery as primary treatment. Settings: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) Intervention: laparotomy, total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) Comparison: laparoscopy; laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) or total laparoscopic hystere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
107
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood loss was lower in patients undergoing laparoscopy in an evaluable subset of patients with this variable reported, and severe postoperative adverse events were also lower in the minimally invasive group. 61 The GOG also demonstrated noninferiority of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in the landmark randomized LAP2 trial. Patients were randomized 2:1 to laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy, BSO, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Blood loss was lower in patients undergoing laparoscopy in an evaluable subset of patients with this variable reported, and severe postoperative adverse events were also lower in the minimally invasive group. 61 The GOG also demonstrated noninferiority of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in the landmark randomized LAP2 trial. Patients were randomized 2:1 to laparoscopic versus open hysterectomy, BSO, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, laparoscopic interventions are associated with significant decreased risk of major surgical adverse events, shorter hospital stays, less pain, and faster recoveries. [32][33][34] Owing to the demonstrated oncological safety of the laparoscopic approach, 28,35 hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by this route is recommended in those patients with no contraindications to laparoscopy (e.g. large-volume uterus).…”
Section: Surgical Staging Procedures For Endometrial Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, surgery should involve a minimal access technique because this has been associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower infection rate and less postoperative pain. 33,34 Importantly, the available data show no difference in survival or rates of recurrence between patients with endometrial cancer undergoing a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and those treated by laparotomy. 34,35 Compared with laparoscopy, robotic surgery may have benefits because the operating time, blood loss, hospital stay and rate of conversion to laparotomy are lower, although the cost remains prohibitive for many hospital trusts.…”
Section: Diagnosing Endometrial Cancer In Obese Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%