1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90112-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopy through the open ipsilateral sac to evaluate presence of contralateral hernia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
25
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial use of laparoscopy in the pediatric hernia patient was to examine the contralateral groin, either through a port or the opened hernia sac, during open unilateral hernia surgery [8][9][10][11]. Recently, the use of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in pediatric surgery has jumped due to improvements in laparoscopic techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial use of laparoscopy in the pediatric hernia patient was to examine the contralateral groin, either through a port or the opened hernia sac, during open unilateral hernia surgery [8][9][10][11]. Recently, the use of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in pediatric surgery has jumped due to improvements in laparoscopic techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the laparoscope through the open hernia sac is now utilized in pediatric surgery, primarily for assessing the contralateral inguinal ring for a patent processus vaginalis [1, 4,6]. This method has helped to reduce the need for contralateral inguinal explorations in the pediatric hernia population, without any additional burdens in terms of operating room time or cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anhand der stratifizierten Daten ist eine eindeutige umgekehrte Proportionalität zum Alter des Kindes zu verzeichnen. Geisler et al [7] beschreiben eine insgesamt erhöhte Inzidenz eines kontralateral offenen PVP bei Mädchen, was jedoch in der Analyse von Wulkan et al nicht bestätigt wird [22]. Diese Zahlen decken sich auch mit der in unserem Kollektiv gefundenen Rate von 42%, wobei hier nur Säuglinge unter einem Jahr eingeschlossen wurden.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified