Despite the introduction of open access gastroscopy, as many as one in three British patients continue to present with advanced disease that is incurable by means of surgery [2,3]. Thorough and accurate staging of patients is of paramount importance in the selection of patients for whom surgery could be potentially curative [4].The recent large regional audit of esophagogastric cancer in Wales revealed that many surgeons continue to undertake small caseloads; staging laparoscopy was performed in 16% of cases; and no fewer than 23% of patients underwent open-and-close operations [3]. Staging protocols for patients with gastric cancer vary, not only from hospital to hospital within the United Kingdom, but from east to west worldwide. While computed tomography (CT) remains the most widely used imaging technique for the preoperative staging of patients with gastric cancer, this modality is limited in its ability to detect local invasion and lymph node metastases [5][6][7][8]. Moreover, we have already shown that specialized radiological support improves the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer and reduces the rate of open-and-shut laparotomy [9].Although routine laparoscopy is now advocated in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer [4], there are discrepant results in the literature as to the clinical value of this procedure [10]. The aims of this study therefore, were to compare the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer as determined by CT and laparoscopy, and to compare this perceived stage with the final true histopathological stage. It was our hypothesis that laparoscopy would improve the accuracy of our preoperative staging process.
Patients and methods
Between