2004
DOI: 10.1159/000080885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumours

Abstract: Background and Aims: The pre-operative determination of resectability of pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasia assists the selection of patients for surgical or non-surgical treatment. This study investigated whether the addition of laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound to dual-phase helical CT could improve the accuracy of assessment of resectability. Patients and Methods: Prospective study of 305 patients referred to a single unit for consideration of pancreatic resection who underwent dual-phase helica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With improvements in contrast-enhanced computed tomography contemporary reports have reduced the number benefiting from preoperative laparoscopy to 4–13% [2,3,4,5, 7] and its usefulness has been questioned [2, 6]. Laparoscopic ultrasonography has the added advantage of being able to assess the parenchyma of the liver and provide information on local relationships of the tumour but the actual advantage remains in dispute [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. This has led to suggestions for the selective use of laparoscopic assessment in those who are at higher risk of unresectable disease [6, 14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With improvements in contrast-enhanced computed tomography contemporary reports have reduced the number benefiting from preoperative laparoscopy to 4–13% [2,3,4,5, 7] and its usefulness has been questioned [2, 6]. Laparoscopic ultrasonography has the added advantage of being able to assess the parenchyma of the liver and provide information on local relationships of the tumour but the actual advantage remains in dispute [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. This has led to suggestions for the selective use of laparoscopic assessment in those who are at higher risk of unresectable disease [6, 14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80% of articles extracted were review articles, whilst the remaining did not assess SL/LUS as staging modality. Of the remaining 41 articles, 12 studies did not satisfy the eligibility criteria; 22 were for potentially resectable PPC and 7 for PBC [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] (Supplemental information, Table ST1 to attain pneumoperitoneum and were therefore excluded from our analysis. Therefore, a total of 2,827 patients with PPC and 478 patients with PBC, deemed potentially resectable on preoperative staging, were included for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 12 patients with PPC, laparoscopic ultrasound examination was not feasible due to previous adhesions, making the staging procedure incomplete. Only 2 studies, clarified RM status and where RM was positive, they were included as false negative 11,32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies comparing laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound with radiological staging modalities have produced controversial results. However, several studies have found that laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound are more accurate than contrastenhanced CT at determining T stage (John et al, 1999;Doran et al, 2004).…”
Section: Laparoscopic Diagnosis/stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%