1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)37381-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous' ECG monitoring should be conducted. Perforation of either the stomach (Fear, 1968;Smith and Dillon, 1970;Peterson and Behrmjn, 1971) or intestine (Chun et a%, 1970;Jordan et a&, 1971;Black, 1971), by either the Verres needle or the trocar have been reported in six gyniecological patients. This complication occurs most frequently when untrained personnel perform laparoscopy or when the patient is obese or has been previously subjected to lower abdominal surgery (Jordan et a%, 1971).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous' ECG monitoring should be conducted. Perforation of either the stomach (Fear, 1968;Smith and Dillon, 1970;Peterson and Behrmjn, 1971) or intestine (Chun et a%, 1970;Jordan et a&, 1971;Black, 1971), by either the Verres needle or the trocar have been reported in six gyniecological patients. This complication occurs most frequently when untrained personnel perform laparoscopy or when the patient is obese or has been previously subjected to lower abdominal surgery (Jordan et a%, 1971).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastro-intestinal damage by the Verres needle or trocar has already been mentioned. In 2 gynaecological patients the stomach was perforated (Smith and Dillon, 1970;Peterson and Behrman, 1971). In the latter patient endotracheal intubation was not practised and distension of the stomach by gas occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty-seven non-gynaecological, and 5 gynaecological patients with intestinal perforation have been reported. Insufficient detail is available in 52 cases, but in the remaining 20, 14 occurred at the site of previous abdominal scars, 3 in patients with multiple intraperitoneal adhesions resulting from tuberculous peritonitis, and 1 in an extremely obese patient (Olim, 1941;Ruddock, 1949;Davey, 1963;Hitzelberger et al, 1966;Vilardell et al, 1968;Chun et al, 1970;Smith and Dillon, 1970;Jordan et al, 1971;Condos, 1972). These results indicate that patients who have previously been submitted to major lower abdominal surgery are not good candidates for laparoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive list of indications, contraindications, complications, and case studies involving the use of the laparoscope has been provided by Smith and Dillon [56], The obvious advantage of laparoscopy noted in their report is that it can be performed in cases where culdoscopy is contraindicated due to disease or abnormal anatomy. A repertoire of ancillary procedures which can be performed with human laparoscopy has been described by Siegler and Garret [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%