2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: Urodynamic evaluation of vesicourethral function

Abstract: Objectives:To assess the impact of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on vesicourethral function and compare it to that of open radical prostatectomy. Methods: Sixty-three patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer were included in this retrospective analysis. Urodynamic parameters, including maximum urethral closing pressure (MUCP), functional profile length (FPL), bladder compliance, maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) and detrusor overactivity, were considered. Conti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matsukawa and colleagues showed a significantly increased rate of DO in patients undergoing an open compared with a laparoscopic prostatectomy, which also accounted for some increased incidence of PPI in their series [7]. We did not find a statistically significant difference in DO between the 2 groups in our study, but we did have a P value approaching significance, suggesting that trend.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Matsukawa and colleagues showed a significantly increased rate of DO in patients undergoing an open compared with a laparoscopic prostatectomy, which also accounted for some increased incidence of PPI in their series [7]. We did not find a statistically significant difference in DO between the 2 groups in our study, but we did have a P value approaching significance, suggesting that trend.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…These urodynamic findings include an increase in the incidence of ISD, a decrease in cystometric capacity and bladder compliance, and an increase in both detrusor overactivity and detrusor under activity [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Some of these variables have been shown to improve with time, but even 3 years following prostatectomy, they may not parameters in patients who underwent radical retropubic (RRP) versus minimally invasive prostatectomy is not nearly as well reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urinary incontinence comprises stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgeny urinary incontinence (UUI). Epidemiology and pathophysiology of SUI after RARP has been assessed in detail and the decrease of urethral sphincter function has been reported as the main etiologic factor of SUI . Storage symptoms such as urinary urgency and UUI are reported to be more bothersome and more prone to reduce QOL than voiding and post‐micturition symptoms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The causes of post-prostatectomy incontinence are considered to be decreased sphincter function, 4 decreased maximum bladder volume, 5 de novo detrusor overactivity and so on. 6 The same underlying mechanism that induces post-prostatectomy incontinence might cause nocturia after radical prostatectomy. However, the association between post-prostatectomy incontinence and nocturia after radical prostatectomy has yet to be clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%