Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer

Park, Jeong-Yeol; Kim, Dae-Yeon; Kim, Jong-Hyeok; Kim, Yong‐Man; Kim, Young‐Tak; Nam, Joo‐Hyun

doi:10.1002/jso.23347

Cited by 73 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Worldwide, several cancer centers have undergone a paradigm shift towards increasing the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques, especially robotic‐assisted laparoscopy (e.g. for localized endometrial and cervical cancer), and several studies have confirmed their safety in terms of adverse events and oncologic outcomes . Consequently, it is likely that future studies will focus on further decreasing the duration of hospital stay for patients undergoing more advanced surgical procedures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the present review, having a malignant indication for mini- and several studies have confirmed their safety in terms of adverse events and oncologic outcomes. [38][39][40][41][42] Consequently, it is likely that future studies will focus on further decreasing the duration of hospital stay for patients undergoing more advanced surgical procedures.…”

Section: Charlson Comorbidity Index <5mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic review of same‐day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy

Korsholm

Mogensen

Jeppesen

et al. 2016

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Same-day discharge has been suggested to safe and acceptable following minimally invasive hysterectomy. Objectives:To evaluate the feasibility of same-day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy and to identify associated factors. Search strategy: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of ControlledTrials were systematically searched using the terms "same day discharge", "minimally invasive surgery", and "hysterectomy" between October 1 and October 31, 2015. No language or publication date restrictions were included.Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating same-day discharge before midnight on the day of minimally invasive hysterectomy were included.Data collection and analysis: Study characteristics, pre-operative selection criteria, and predictive factors for same-day discharge were analyzed.Main results: There were 15 observational studies with 11 992 patients included.Significant heterogeneity was observed in the studies, and publication and selection bias could have potentially affected the results. All the studies concluded that sameday discharge was feasible. However, some factors were associated with a decreased possibility of same-day discharge; these were older age, beginning surgery later than 1:00 pm and completing surgery later than 6:00 pm, longer duration of operation, and high estimated blood loss.Conclusions: Same-day discharge appears feasible for a majority of patients who undergo minimally invasive hysterectomies if adequate emphasis is placed on presurgical planning and careful patient selection.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Charlson Comorbidity Index <5mentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of same‐day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy

Korsholm

Mogensen

Jeppesen

et al. 2016

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Table 2 summarizes the findings of various studies comparing the laparoscopic approach versus the conventional open access [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Other studies have concluded that the laparoscopic, or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy results in less overall morbidity, less blood loss, fewer transfusions, a shorter hospitalization (by 3 days), a longer surgical time, and equal recurrence rates as compared to the classical open management [32,33,34,35,36].…”

Section: Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Accessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Brucker

Ulrich

2016

Oncol Res Treat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surgical treatment of cervical cancer has been a cornerstone in the management of this malignancy for more than 100 years. Today, for early-stage and low-risk cervical cancer, surgery is still considered the gold standard. If the preoperative assessment of the tumor reveals a situation prompting postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy, the latter should be planned as the primary treatment option, being preceded by staging laparoscopy including pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection. As an alternative to the open approach, the definitive surgical treatment should be either performed laparoscopically, or be laparoscopic-assisted, or laparoscopically robotic-assisted.

show abstract

“…Park retrospectively compared the survival and surgical outcomes of 115 laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) vs 118 open radical hysterectomy (ORH) in patients with stage IB2 to IIA2 [ 12 ]. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in two patients.…”

Section: Radical Hysterectomy and Nervesparing Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%