Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in aging patients: A propensity score matching-based retrospective study

Abstract

Objective: Although laparoscopic repair has been widely carried out and promoted due to its minimally invasive advantages, open surgery is still popularly compared to elderly patients. This study aims to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LIHR) vs. open repair of inguinal hernias (OIHR) in elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the database was performed to identify elderly patients, from January 2021 through December 2022, who underwent surgery for an inguinal hernia. After a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper of 0.1 was conducted to balance potential bias, binary logistic regressions were used for categorical and continuous outcomes. Results: After PSM, 78 pairs of elderly patients were enrolled in this study, and there were no significant differences in baseline between LIHR and OIHRgroups. Compared to OIHR, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that LIHR was independently affected for reducing intraoperative hemorrhage (OR=0.06, 95%CI: 0.02-0.18, P <0.001) and shortening postoperative hospitalization time (OR=0.29, 95%CI: 0.15-0.57, P <0.001) in elderly patients. Furthermore, LIHR (OR=0.28, 95%CI: 0.14-0.57, P <0.001) and age (OR=0.89, 95%CI: 0.82-0.96, P=0.002) were independent affecting factors forrelieving postoperative pain. While, no obvious differences were detected in postoperative complications [LIHR 7.7% (6/78) vs OIHR 14.1%(11/78)，P=0.199]. Conclusions: LIHRwas closely associated with reducing intraoperative hemorrhage and shortening postoperative hospitalization time. Whilst LIHR and age were independently affectingfactors for relieving postoperative pain.