Abstract:Large series of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair have shown excellent results. However, published comparative studies have had conflicting outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the first 29 laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs performed at a VA Medical Center from January 2000 to June 2001. The outcome was compared to that of open repairs performed during the same time period. Outcomes between the groups were similar in all respects, except for the length of stay. The conversion rate for the laparoscopic appr… Show more
“…Obesity does not represent a contraindication for laparoscopic approach for treating fascial defects [20,25], and in our series 38 patients were obese. The overall mean duration of surgery in this study was 152 min, comparable with the 50-149 min reported in other studies that included hernias of smaller mean size [20,22,[26][27][28]. Laparoscopic division of adhesions represents a very important step in incisional hernia repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Laparoscopic division of adhesions represents a very important step in incisional hernia repair. Intestinal injury during adhesiolysis ranges from 0% to 6% and such a complication is more frequent during the learning phase and can jeopardize the procedure when not recognized intraoperatively [4,28]. We currently use laparoscopic scissors and avoid coagulation by both ultrasonic scalpel and bipolar forceps close to the intestinal loops.…”
Minimal access procedures can provide good results in the repair of incisional hernia, even when the diameter is larger than 15 cm. Obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopic repair. Further studies are expected to confirm these promising results.
“…Obesity does not represent a contraindication for laparoscopic approach for treating fascial defects [20,25], and in our series 38 patients were obese. The overall mean duration of surgery in this study was 152 min, comparable with the 50-149 min reported in other studies that included hernias of smaller mean size [20,22,[26][27][28]. Laparoscopic division of adhesions represents a very important step in incisional hernia repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Laparoscopic division of adhesions represents a very important step in incisional hernia repair. Intestinal injury during adhesiolysis ranges from 0% to 6% and such a complication is more frequent during the learning phase and can jeopardize the procedure when not recognized intraoperatively [4,28]. We currently use laparoscopic scissors and avoid coagulation by both ultrasonic scalpel and bipolar forceps close to the intestinal loops.…”
Minimal access procedures can provide good results in the repair of incisional hernia, even when the diameter is larger than 15 cm. Obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopic repair. Further studies are expected to confirm these promising results.
“…Any intervention, e.g., simple insertion of a clamp in a trocar without adequate vision, can be the cause of this complication. This aspect should make surgeons aware of correctly indicating the laparoscopic approach and offering patients and their relatives complete information (informed consent); it should keep surgeons alert throughout the operation and ensure that they have sufficient experience and resources to act appropriately in any suspicious situation [6,28,35].…”
1) Intra-abdominal composite mesh is good tolerance. 2) The recurrence rate is low and within 1 year of the operation. 3) The long-term morbidity with LIHR is moderate. 4) The risk of intestinal injury is not predictable. 5) Reoperations can be performed with sufficient guarantee using laparoscopy.
“…During laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, mesh manipulation and placement can be time consuming and, if not performed properly, can result in recurrence [11][12][13].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.