2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 An open colorectal surgery has a more prolonged postoperative ileus than a laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, probably due to a longer visceral manipulation and environmental exposure and higher use of analgesic drugs to control postoperative pain. [29][30][31] We found that gum chewing especially benefited patients who underwent open surgery. Gum chewing can also extend the benefits of the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…27,28 An open colorectal surgery has a more prolonged postoperative ileus than a laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, probably due to a longer visceral manipulation and environmental exposure and higher use of analgesic drugs to control postoperative pain. [29][30][31] We found that gum chewing especially benefited patients who underwent open surgery. Gum chewing can also extend the benefits of the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The use of laparoscopic approach provides a magnified view, enabling precise anatomical dissection and therefore involving less manipulation of the tumour-bearing part of the bowel. Another reason for this difference may be the adverse effects of open surgery on the immune system [25][26][27]. Laparoscopic surgery alleviates the need for a long midline laparotomy wound and therefore minimizes access trauma D.C.T.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies have demonstrated that preoperative neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery for advanced rectal cancer (T3; T4) results in better survival rates, better local control and comparable better toxicity than surgery alone [20][21][22]. In addition, laparoscopy-assisted colectomy has been accepted as being less invasive than open surgery for colorectal cancer with mucosal or submucosal invasion, although the latter is still preferable for the treatment of more advanced cancers [23,24]. Therefore, accurate staging of colorectal cancer is required in order to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy and to evaluate the results of adjuvant treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%