Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity

Mohamed, Tantawi Abdel Naeem; Razik, Salah Abdel; Hassanien, Ayman Mohamed; Tohamy, Tohamy; Azeem, Ashraf Abdel; Zaazou, Mohamed M.T

doi:10.21608/mjmr.2022.221507

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, Lee et al [11] showed that there was no statistically significant difference in operation time between LSG and bypass surgeries. Similar to the present findings, Mohamed et al [10] reported that hospital stay was statistically significant longer in the bypass group compared to the LSG group. Different from the current findings, Elkerkary et al [12] reported that hospital stay was statistically significant longer in the LSG group compared to the bypass group.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…The difference in average BMI changes after surgery between the study groups was statistically significant. The LSG group, however, was linked to greater weight loss at 1 month and 3 months, whereas there was no discernible difference at 9 and 12 months, according to Mohamed et al [10] . The present study showed that the mean cholesterol after 3 months was 156.92±14.90 and 163.08±16.31 between bypass and LSG respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Different from the current results, Abd-Elmonem et al [9] reported that there was no statistically significant difference between LSG and bypass regarding operation time. Also, Mohamed et al [10] reported that there was no statistically significant difference between LSG and bypass regarding operation time. Moreover, Lee et al [11] showed that there was no statistically significant difference in operation time between LSG and bypass surgeries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic single anastemosis sleeve ileal bypass in control of triglyceridemia in obese patients

Abdeen,

Majeed,

Galal

2023

Int. J. Surg. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An independent risk factor for atherosclerotic heart disease is hypertriglyceridemia (HTG). Acute pancreatitis is also a danger for people with serum triglyceride (TG) levels >1000 mg/dL. The most successful weight loss treatment now available has been proven to be bariatric surgery. The aim of this work was to compare between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus laparoscopic Single anastomosis Sleeve Ileal bypass in control of HTG in obese patients. Methods: Fifty-two individuals, aged 18 to 65, of both sexes, with a BMI of 30 to 55 kg/m 2 , T2D, a history of prior unsuccessful weight loss attempts, and strong surgical motivation were included in this prospective study. Type 1 diabetics, those above the age of 15, people with BMIs under 30, people over 55, those who had previously undergone gastric or obesity surgery, and women who were pregnant were all excluded from the study. The included patients were split into two groups: obese patients in group I (N=26) had LSG, while obese patients in group II (N=26) got laparoscopic gastric bypass. Results: The mean cholesterol after 3 months was 156.92±14.90 and 163.08±16.31 between bypass and LSG respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the bypass and LSG. The cholesterol level after 3 months all participants were desirable in bypass, was 96.15% desirable in LSG and 3.85% non-desirable bypass in LSG. The mean triglyceride after 3 months was 129.23±13.47 and 144.62±14.21 between bypass and LSG respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the bypass and LSG. Triglyceride level after 3 months was desirable in 92.31% bypass and 57.69% LSG and nor desirable in 7.69% bypass and 42.31% LSG between bypass and LSG. There was a statistically significant difference between the bypass and LSG. Conclusions: Gastric bypass was associated produce more favorable outcomes compared LSG in diabetes obese patients. This is observed in more weight loss after 1-year, better lipid profile after 3 months.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic single anastemosis sleeve ileal bypass in control of triglyceridemia in obese patients

Abdeen,

Majeed,

Galal

2023

Int. J. Surg. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Females constituted the majority of our patients 12/18 (66.7%). This gender incidence was matched with that reported by Mohamed et al (9) (78.7%) also with Sherif et al (10) 18/20 (80%).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Assessment of Late Complications after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity Patients

Ibrahim¹,

Latif²,

Eldurssi³

et al. 2022

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The difference in the perioperative changes in the mean BMI between the study groups was statistically significant. On the other hand, Mohamed et al [9] reported that SG group was associated with more weight loss at 1 month, and 3 months while there was no significant difference at 9 and 12 months.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Comparison between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastric bypass management of type 2 diabetes mellitus obese patients

Abdeen,

Majeed,

Mohamed

2023

Int. J. Surg. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Obesity is considered a pan-endemic health problem all over the world. Morbid obesity defined by the National Institutes of Health as a BMI of greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2 or greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2 in the presence of obesity comorbidities like hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), joint pain and obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this work was to compare between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) versus laparoscopic One Anastemosis gastric bypass management of T2D Obese Patients. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 52 people 18-65 years old of both sexes, BMI 30-50 kg/m 2 , with T2D, a history of failed weight loss attempts in the past and good motivation for surgery. Included patients were divided into two groups: group I (N=26): obese patients underwent Laparoscopic SG, and group II (N=26): obese patients underwent Laparoscopic Mini Gastric bypass. Results: The mean random blood sugar after one week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year was statistically significant lower in bypass compared SG. The HBA1c after 3 months was remission in (69.23% and 23.08%) patients and no remission in (30.77% and 76.92%) patients between bypass and SG respectively. Thus, it was statistically significant higher in bypass compared to SG. Conclusions: Gastric bypass was associated with better outcomes compared to SG in diabetes mellitus obese patients. This is observed in more weight loss after 1year, better HbA1c after 3, 6 months and 1 year.

show abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in obesity

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic single anastemosis sleeve ileal bypass in control of triglyceridemia in obese patients

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic single anastemosis sleeve ileal bypass in control of triglyceridemia in obese patients

Assessment of Late Complications after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity Patients

Comparison between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastric bypass management of type 2 diabetes mellitus obese patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About