2013
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Single-Center Experience in China

Abstract: In our experience, laparoscopic retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty is effective and feasible. With the improvement of technique, we believe that it would become a new standard treatment for UPJ obstruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 However, potential advantages of these techniques remain controversial and con-cerns have been expressed regarding the risk of abdominal injuries, the small operative space and the technical difficulties. 3 We started to use a retroperitoneal LPSc-assisted approach in January 2005. This procedure combines the advantages of a minimally invasive technique with the high success rate of standard dismembered pyeloplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, potential advantages of these techniques remain controversial and con-cerns have been expressed regarding the risk of abdominal injuries, the small operative space and the technical difficulties. 3 We started to use a retroperitoneal LPSc-assisted approach in January 2005. This procedure combines the advantages of a minimally invasive technique with the high success rate of standard dismembered pyeloplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In majority of the centers worldwide where the modified PCNL equipments are not available, conventional PCNL is the standard of care in managing urolithiasis. In the current era of laparoscopy, based on various studies retroperitoneoscopic approach is preferred in treating various urological conditions [11]; [12] . Retroperitoneoscopic approach in the management of urolithiasis has several advantages like direct access to renal pelvis, less dissection, minimal blood loss, removal of stone intact, shorter convalescence, nil nephron damage and the morbid complications of PCNL are negligible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Piaggio et al are against the use of laparoscopic approach in children and especially in infants because laparoscopic suturing is challenging, time consuming and associated with a prolonged learning curve [16]. For the same reasons, some authors stress the importance of the surgeon's and entire team's expertise limited to selected centers [3,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%