Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With a Remote Controlled Robot

Abbou, Clément‐Claude; Hoznek, Andràs; Salomon, Laurent; Olsson, Leif Eric; Lobonţiu, Adrian; Saint, F.; Cicco, Antony; Antiphon, Patrick; Chopin, Dominique

doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66251-9

Cited by 271 publications

(106 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Among patients with a PSM, the majority had pathologic T3 disease or T4, and the percentage with pathologic stage T3 and T4 were statistically higher than between T2 patients (P < 0.001). The mean lymph node yield was 9.2 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). The lymph node positivity was 7 (1.8 %).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since RARP was introduced in 2000, it has become an important choice for localized PC [12,13]. There are several potential advantages of the robotic approach.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bereits im Jahr 2000 publizierten Abbou et al [5] einen Fallbericht über die Durchführung einer roboterassistierten radikalen Nephrektomie. 2005 belegten Klingler et al [6] die Praktikabilität der roboterassistierten radikalen Nephrektomie anhand einer kleinen Patientenserie.…”

Section: Kommentar Zur Nephrektomielaparoskopisch Vs Robotischunclassified

Kommentar zur Nephrektomie – laparoskopisch vs. robotisch

Riedmiller

2012

Urologe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Demgegenüber besteht bisher nur eine sehr limitierte Erfahrung mit Operationsrobotern in der Urologie. Nur wenige Zentren haben versucht eine robotergesteuerte TUR-P zu verwirklichen [43,49] und erst im Jahre 2000 gelang es erfolgreich, Master-slave-Systeme im Rahmen telechirurgischer laparoskopischer komplizierter Eingriffe,wie der laparoskopischen radikalen Prostatektomie einzusetzen [1,5,45,47,51,53].…”

Section: Zusammenfassungunclassified

“…Erste urologische Erfahrungen im Jahr 2000 stammen aus der Universitätsklinik Frankfurt am Main [5], wobei das System zur laparoskopischen radikalen Prostatektomie eingesetzt wurde. Im selben Jahr hatten wir, wie auch andere europäische Arbeitsgruppen (Tabelle 7), die Gelegenheit da Vinci klinisch zu testen [1,45,47,51]. Inzwischen ist es auch umfangreich in den USA zum Einsatz gekommen [ [2].…”

Section: Klinische Erfahrungen Mit Der Telechirurgieunclassified

Geometrie der Laparoskopie,, Telechirurgie, Training und Telementoring

Rassweiler

Frede

2002

Urologe [A]

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Laparoscopic surgery in general is handicapped by the reduction of the range of motion from 6 to 4 degrees of freedom. This has a major impact on technically difficult procedures such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Solutions for this problem include understanding the geometry of laparoscopy with sophisticated training programs, but also newly developed surgical robots, computer simulators, and telementoring. This article evaluates the value of these alternatives based on own experience and an analysis of the current literature. Our experience with robot-assisted surgery includes 244 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using a voice-controlled camera arm (AESOP) and 6 telesurgical interventions with the da Vinci system. Additionally, experimental studies were performed focussing on the geometry of laparoscopy and new training concepts such as perfused pelvitrainers and computer simulation. Three-dimensional systems have not yet proved to be effective due to handling problems such as shutter glasses, video helmets, or reduced brightness. At present, there are only two robotic surgical systems (ZEUS, da Vinci) in clinical use for telesurgery, of which only the da Vinci provides stereovision and all 6 degrees of freedom (DOF). In the meantime, more than 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies have been performed with this system. However, there was no evidence of any advantages over the conventional laparoscopic approach. The ZEUS in combination with the telecommunication system SOKRATES is the only device that enables telemanipulation and telementoring over long distances (i.e., transatlantic). Robotic surgery represents a turning point in surgical research. However, broad use of robotic systems is limited mainly because of high investment and running costs. Whereas audiovisual telementoring will play a clear role in future training concepts, the need for telemanipulation or telesurgery has not yet been clarified.

show abstract

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With a Remote Controlled Robot

Cited by 271 publications

References 10 publications

Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients

Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients

Kommentar zur Nephrektomie – laparoskopisch vs. robotisch

Geometrie der Laparoskopie,, Telechirurgie, Training und Telementoring

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About