2016
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcome data: how should surgeon’s performance be reported? A retrospective learning curve analysis of two surgeons

Abstract: ObjectiveTo document the learning curve for the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) procedure and discuss the optimal usage of prospectively documented outcome data for reporting a surgeon’s performance.Materials and methodsUsing prospectively collected data from the first series of patients to undergo LRP by two surgeons in the same institution, linear and logistic regression multivariate analyses per 25 patients were carried out to graphically represent the surgical learning curve for operative time, bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It helps accelerate evidence generation through providing observational studies that can generate new hypotheses and support policy makers. Prior to its formal development, a wide variety of studies had already been published using the clinical data of GSTT's cancer patients (based on individual ethics or audit approval) including various studies focused on prostate cancer [4][5][6][7][8][9], breast cancer [10][11][12][13] and renal cancer [14]. The below case study shows how data from Guy's Cancer Cohort was used to address a clinically important question for bladder cancer:…”
Section: Utility and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It helps accelerate evidence generation through providing observational studies that can generate new hypotheses and support policy makers. Prior to its formal development, a wide variety of studies had already been published using the clinical data of GSTT's cancer patients (based on individual ethics or audit approval) including various studies focused on prostate cancer [4][5][6][7][8][9], breast cancer [10][11][12][13] and renal cancer [14]. The below case study shows how data from Guy's Cancer Cohort was used to address a clinically important question for bladder cancer:…”
Section: Utility and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant decrease for one surgeon and a declining trend for the second one regarding postoperative complications. There was no difference regarding the rates of compromised surgical margins between the groups of patients [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100-150 vakadan sonra cerrahın tecrübesi plato çizerek sabitlenir. Bir cerrahın yeterliliğini gösteren bir çok faktör olsa da T2 cerrahi sınır pozitifliği cerrahın yeterliliğini gösteren en objektif parametredir [8]. Bizim çalışmamızda 5 (%21,7) hastada cerrahi sınır pozitif olarak geldi.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified