2000
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Microwave Coagulation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: LMCT under local anesthesia is a minimally invasive and effective therapy when carried out on a single occasion to treat HCCs located near the liver surface, and it can be safely performed under direct visual guidance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, only a few cases of laparoscopic RITA of HCC have been reported [6,8,14,33,34,38] and a few cases of laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy have been published [16,37]. In our series, 27% of 86 patients submitted to L-LUS had new malignant nodules, which required additional treatment during the same laparoscopic procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…To date, only a few cases of laparoscopic RITA of HCC have been reported [6,8,14,33,34,38] and a few cases of laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy have been published [16,37]. In our series, 27% of 86 patients submitted to L-LUS had new malignant nodules, which required additional treatment during the same laparoscopic procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Over the past two decades, considerable improvements in percutaneous/laparoscopic MWA techniques have resulted in improved outcomes. [8][9][10] MWA has been predominantly used in China and Japan, [11][12][13] but the technique is now gaining popularity in the West.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30] Compared to sequential ablations, simultaneous multiple applicator ablations offer the potential for synergistic heating between applicators, leading to faster ablation of targets, however, there is a small risk of skin burns as has been observed in some clinical studies. [31][32][33] A recent study by Sindram et al, reported that the occurrence of skin burns is a function of the array insertion depth and the minimum interapplicator spacing, in the case of nonparallel implants, 34 and could be avoided by placing constraints on insertion depth and applicator spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%