Background
Instruments that apply energy to cut, coagulate and dissect tissue with minimal bleeding facilitate surgery. The improper use of energy devices may increase patient morbidity and mortality. The current article reviews various energy sources in terms of their common uses and safe practices.
Methods
For the purpose of this review, a general search was conducted through NCBI, SpringerLink and Google. Articles describing laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgeries using a single or multiple energy sources are considered, as are the articles comparing various commercial energy devices in laboratory settings. Keywords such as ‘laparoscopy’, ‘energy’, ‘laser’, ‘electrosurgery’, ‘monopolar’, ‘bipolar’, ‘harmonic’, ‘ultrasonic’, ‘cryosurgery’, ‘argon beam’, ‘laser’, ‘complications’, and ‘death’ were used in the search.
Results and Conclusion
A review of the literature shows that the performance of the energy devices depends upon the type of procedure. There is no consensus as to which device is optimal for a given procedure. The technical skill level of the surgeon and the knowledge about the devices are both important factors in deciding safe outcomes. As new energy devices enter the market increases, surgeons should be aware of their indicated use in laparoscopic, endoscopic and open surgery.