Laparoscopic liver resection: Experience based guidelines

Abstract

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Despite initial skepticism, improved operative results made laparoscopic approach incorporated to surgical practice and operations increased in frequency and complexity. Evidence supporting LLR comes from case-series, comparative studies and meta-analysis. Despite lack of level 1 evidence, the body of literature is stronger and existing data confirms the safety, feasibility and benefits of laparoscopic approach when compared to open resection. Indications for LLR do not differ from those for open surgery. They include benign and malignant (both primary and metastatic) tumors and living donor liver harvesting. Currently, resection of lesions located on anterolateral segments and left lateral sectionectomy are performed systematically by laparoscopy in hepatobiliary specialized centers. Resection of lesions located on posterosuperior segments (1, 4a, 7, 8) and major liver resections were shown to be feasible but remain technically demanding procedures, which should be reserved to experienced surgeons. Hand-assisted and laparoscopy-assisted procedures appeared to increase the indications of minimally invasive liver surgery and are useful strategies applied to difficult and major resections. LLR proved to be safe for malignant lesions and offers some short-term advantages over open resection. Oncological results including resection margin status and long-term survival were not inferior to open resection. At present, surgical community expects high quality studies to base the already perceived better outcomes achieved by laparoscopy in major centers' practice. Continuous surgical training, as well as new technologies should augment the application of laparoscopic liver surgery. Future applicability of new technologies such as robot assistance and image-guided surgery is still under investigation.

Standardizing terminology for minimally invasive pancreatic resection

“…18. Sub-classification terms should be: "reactive" and "conditional" 18 and routinely used 19,20 in minimally invasive hepatic surgery, in MIPR it may have confounding meaning. It could be used to mean the procedure is performed with a hand access port, or that it is actually a combined approach, or even that it was converted.…”

Robot-assisted Living-donor Left Lateral Sectionectomy

“…It should be stressed that the CUSA system, the most useful instrument in laparoscopic liver surgery, cannot be applied in robotic surgeries. [45] In addition, medical insurance does not cover the relatively high expense, which limits the development of robotic surgeries.…”

Laparoscopic treatment of a large pedunculated hemangioma of the liver: a case report

“…In a few cases a mass mimicking a submucosal tumor of the stomach has been reported (12,21). Concerning the surgical technique, the laparoscopic approach remains indisputable, due to its minimally invasive characteristics, the easiness of the carrying out, the moderate postoperative pain, the possibility of a short-stay management, the low complications rate and the return of bowel activity (22)(23)(24). The optimal laparoscopic approach should give the benefits of the classical laparoscopic triangulation.…”