2016
DOI: 10.7326/m15-1210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Lavage for Perforated Diverticulitis With Purulent Peritonitis

Abstract: ALF; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, patients with purulent peritonitis were commonly misclassified as having colonic or pelvic abscesses. This is particularly relevant now, as multiple investigators seek to understand the appropriate role of laparoscopic lavage in Hinchey III diverticulitis 109110111…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, patients with purulent peritonitis were commonly misclassified as having colonic or pelvic abscesses. This is particularly relevant now, as multiple investigators seek to understand the appropriate role of laparoscopic lavage in Hinchey III diverticulitis 109110111…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hope is that these patients could be treated with laparoscopic lavage without needing repair or resection of a gastrointestinal defect. Three recent RCTs have examined this approach in perforated diverticulitis, randomizing about 350 patients with purulent peritonitis to laparoscopic lavage or sigmoidectomy 109110111. All three trials excluded hemodynamically unstable patients and those with feculent peritonitis.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laparoscopic era, colorectal surgeons may agree to attempt laparoscopic management of colorectal perforation following colonoscopy, diverticulitis, and anastomotic leakage [12], [13], [14], [15]. The SCANDIV trial showed that laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis is no better than conventional operations; laparoscopic lavage did not reduce morbidity and had worse outcomes, such as high reoperation rate and missing carcinoma [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laparoscopic era, colorectal surgeons may agree to attempt laparoscopic management of colorectal perforation following colonoscopy, diverticulitis, and anastomotic leakage [9][10][11][12]. The SCANDIV trial showed that laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis is no better than conventional operations; laparoscopic lavage did not reduce morbidity and had worse outcomes, such as high reoperation rate and missing carcinoma [9].…”
Section: Discussion:-mentioning
confidence: 99%