“…The sources included a broad array of participant numbers, ranging from sources with unclear numbers of people with intersex variations (Dwyer et al, 2015;Howard, 2015;Kim et al, 2015;Rios et al, 2015) through to a source with 272 participants specifically from the group (Jones, 2016). Higher numbers were rare, however, as over a third of the sources focused on only one participant (Amanda, 2015; Bonanni et al, 2015;Brasileiro et al, 2016;Ceci et al, 2015;Cynthia, 2015;Davis, 2015b;Garcia, 2015;Grimbly et al, 2016;Grover et al, 2015;Gül et al, 2015;Inter, 2015;Kalra et al, 2016;Long, 2015;Mannaerts et al, 2015;Mutlu et al, 2015;Pagonis, 2015;Palanisamy et al, 2015;Paula et al, 2015;Petersen, 2015;Quinn, 2015;Simon, 2015;Truffer, 2015;Viloria, 2015;von Klan, 2015;Walsh, 2015;Zieselman, 2015). Almost as many had no direct participants with intersex variations and, instead, used the general existence of the group, other participants, or secondary sources to make key arguments about intersex variations (Achermann et al, 2015;Anderson, 2015;Anonymous, 2016;Baratz & Karkazis, 2015;Dreger, 2015;Frader, 2015;Grimes, 2016;…”