2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Indications and Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] reported the first successful laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in 1990, yet the uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) has been slow [2]; 8.2% of UK resections are performed laparoscopically [3] and only 18% of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) members have a laparoscopic practice approaching 50% of suitable cases [2]. This poor uptake arose through initial concerns about oncological safety [4–6] and a technically demanding learning curve [7–9]. Large randomized trials (CLASICC [10], COST [11], Barcelona [12]), Cochrane reviews [13] and meta‐analyses [14] have all concluded that LCRS is not only safe, but it is also associated with better short‐term outcome and does not worsen long‐term cancer survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] reported the first successful laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in 1990, yet the uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) has been slow [2]; 8.2% of UK resections are performed laparoscopically [3] and only 18% of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) members have a laparoscopic practice approaching 50% of suitable cases [2]. This poor uptake arose through initial concerns about oncological safety [4–6] and a technically demanding learning curve [7–9]. Large randomized trials (CLASICC [10], COST [11], Barcelona [12]), Cochrane reviews [13] and meta‐analyses [14] have all concluded that LCRS is not only safe, but it is also associated with better short‐term outcome and does not worsen long‐term cancer survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 12‐month period to March 2007, 8.82% of resections were performed by this method [4]. Explanations offered included concerns about oncological safety [5–7] and the recognition of the relatively long and technically demanding learning curve [8–11]. Large long‐term randomized control trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer have supported the view that the original concerns were unfounded (MRC CLASICC [12], COST [13] and Barcelona [14] trials).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 12‐month period upto March 2007, 8.82% of resections were performed by this method (Nice 2006) [6]. Major reasoning for this delayed uptake included early concerns about oncological safety [7–9] and the recognition of the relatively long and technically demanding learning curve [10–13]. Large, long‐term randomized control trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer have supported the view that the original concerns were unfounded (MRC CLASSIC [14], COST [15] and Barcelona [16] trials).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%