2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9314-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cirrhotic Patients with Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Case‐control Study

Abstract: These results indicate that videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy may be safely performed in public hospitals in Brazil, with low levels of complications, no associated mortality, and no need for blood derivatives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the NIH consensus conference on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1992 suggested that patients with cirrhosis were ''not usually candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy'' [1] studies continue to be published supporting the safety of the approach in patients with Child's A or B cirrhosis (including downgrading from C after appropriate treatment) [39] with almost no data using the Model for EndStage Liver Disease (MELD) score to compare patients [139]; though there is little published data for Child's C patients, what is available suggests it should be avoided in favor of nonoperative approaches such as percutaneous cholecystostomy [140]. Recent studies generally agree that laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected cirrhotics has a relatively low conversion rate (0-11%), complication rate (9.5-21%), and risk of dying (0-6.3%), with most showing worsening liver failure, including the presence of ascites and coagulopathy, predicting poorer outcomes [139][140][141][142][143][144]; a recent prospective randomized trial found that laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safer than open cholecystectomy in cirrhotics [145]. Some authors have suggested laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy as an alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy [146,147].…”
Section: Gallstone Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the NIH consensus conference on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1992 suggested that patients with cirrhosis were ''not usually candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy'' [1] studies continue to be published supporting the safety of the approach in patients with Child's A or B cirrhosis (including downgrading from C after appropriate treatment) [39] with almost no data using the Model for EndStage Liver Disease (MELD) score to compare patients [139]; though there is little published data for Child's C patients, what is available suggests it should be avoided in favor of nonoperative approaches such as percutaneous cholecystostomy [140]. Recent studies generally agree that laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected cirrhotics has a relatively low conversion rate (0-11%), complication rate (9.5-21%), and risk of dying (0-6.3%), with most showing worsening liver failure, including the presence of ascites and coagulopathy, predicting poorer outcomes [139][140][141][142][143][144]; a recent prospective randomized trial found that laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safer than open cholecystectomy in cirrhotics [145]. Some authors have suggested laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy as an alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy [146,147].…”
Section: Gallstone Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10,13–15 A low threshold for conversion to open cholecystectomy should be maintained. Conversion should not be considered as a failure to achieve a difficult task, but a reflection of sound judgment, because it is meant to prevent more serious complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty of safety and efficiency warrants an immediate conversion to an open procedure. 10,13–15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations