2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000129662.83162.2e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Ileal Neobladder: A Comparison With the Open Approach

Abstract: LACINB is a feasible and reproducible procedure, which results in decreased postoperative pain and quicker recovery without a significant increase in operative time. However, longer followup is needed to assess long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
63
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with what have been previously reported by Basillote et al that had to convert a laparoscopic procedure due to the markedly enlarged size (10 cm) of the bladder tumor arising in posterior bladder wall that preclude the posterior dissection between the prostate and rectum safely (7). Based on this experience, we believe that the tumor size (high-volume tumors) is an important criteria for proper patient selection and may represent relative or even a formal contraindication for the laparoscopic approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in line with what have been previously reported by Basillote et al that had to convert a laparoscopic procedure due to the markedly enlarged size (10 cm) of the bladder tumor arising in posterior bladder wall that preclude the posterior dissection between the prostate and rectum safely (7). Based on this experience, we believe that the tumor size (high-volume tumors) is an important criteria for proper patient selection and may represent relative or even a formal contraindication for the laparoscopic approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In our series, the overall incidence of complications was 42%, being 7 intraoperative (12%) and 18 postoperative (30%), which is comparable to the 30.5% of complications (only postoperative complica- tions) that were found after studying 2,538 subjects that underwent open radical cystectomy, with ileus in 9.7%, urinary tract infection in 7.8%, dehiscence in 5.5%, wound infection in 5.2%, and postoperative hemorrhage in 1.8%, requiring transfusion greater than 4 units within 72 hours postoperatively (8). In fact, in a review of 152 laparoscopic radical cystectomies performed at 5 centers, the mean operative time was 398 minutes and the mean blood loss was 605 mL (7,(9)(10)(11)(12). Twenty eight complications occurred (18.5%), including 1 dehydration, 1 obturator nerve paresis, 1 pelvic infection, 4 urinary tract infection, 1 injury to the external iliac vein, 1 subcutaneous emphysema in one patient with hypercarbia, 2 pulmonary embolism, 5 urinary fistulas (1 case of neobladder to vagina fistula), 3 hematomas, 1 ureteral obstruction secondary to misplaced ureteral catheter, 1 bladder neck contracture, 1 epididymal abscess, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 internal hernia requiring laparotomy 19 days postoperatively, 2 small rectal tears and 2 partial small bowel obstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several reports have formerly been published that compare LRC and ORC, in which the pain scores and analgesic requirements in the LRC group were significantly lower than those in the ORC group. 9,[14][15][16] It is inferred that the reduced analgesic consumption, reflecting less pain, promoted the earlier recovery of bowel function and return to normal activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The first laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) was reported in 1995 by Sánchez de Badajoz et al 2 LRC was performed in an increasing number of centers, and major short-term patient-related benefits, such as less estimated blood loss, earlier return of bowel function and shorter length of stay, had been reported in nearly all studies of LRC. [3][4][5] However, LRC is not routine for most urologists because it is difficult to learn and there is a notable learning curve with LRC. 6 In addition, the surgeon should have experience of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%