2014
DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.141694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis utilizing a pfannenstiel incision

Abstract: Laparoscopic approaches have been increasingly used in selected patients with either colorectal or liver cancer. However, simultaneous resection of colorectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases is still a subject of debate. The present case describes combined laparoscopic rectal and liver resections for a patient with primary rectal cancer and a synchronous liver metastasis utilizing a Pfannenstiel incision for specimen extraction. The operative time was 370 min and estimated blood loss was 400 mL. Po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the optimal strategy for resectable CRC with SLMs has not been established yet, the one-stage approach for simultaneous colectomy and hepatectomy gives the advantages to avoid two surgical procedures thus reducing risk for patient and costs for the community while keeping acceptable morbidity and good oncologic results [ 13 , 35 ]. Recently, MIA for simultaneous resection of CRC and SLMs has become popular [ 10 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 36 ]. Modern combined MIA, by laparoscopic and/or with robotic assistance, although being in its preliminary phase of experiences, has been showed to be feasible and safe even in cases requiring major liver resections [ 21 , 25 , 30 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the optimal strategy for resectable CRC with SLMs has not been established yet, the one-stage approach for simultaneous colectomy and hepatectomy gives the advantages to avoid two surgical procedures thus reducing risk for patient and costs for the community while keeping acceptable morbidity and good oncologic results [ 13 , 35 ]. Recently, MIA for simultaneous resection of CRC and SLMs has become popular [ 10 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 36 ]. Modern combined MIA, by laparoscopic and/or with robotic assistance, although being in its preliminary phase of experiences, has been showed to be feasible and safe even in cases requiring major liver resections [ 21 , 25 , 30 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Многоцентровыми рандомизированными исследо-ваниями доказано отсутствие различий в непосредст-венных и отдаленных результатах частоты возникнове-ния рецидивов и метастазов между лапароскопически ми и открытыми хирургическими вмешательствами [17][18][19]. В последнее время все больше появляется работ, де-монстрирующих возможность внедрения лапароско-пических методов при лечении метастатического КРР [20][21][22][23][24][25]. Так, по мнению Y. Miyamoto [20], лапароско-пическая резекция первичной опухоли при генерали-зованном КРР является возможной и безопасной, а Z. Zhu и соавт.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…No study compared the outcome of procedures performed by one or two teams together. In only 14 of the 31 papers considered for the present analysis, the authors stated whether the surgical procedure was performed by one team (n = 6) [44,91,112,[163][164][165]; two teams (n = 6) [36,41,43,94,166,167]; or by both (n = 2, multi-institutional studies) [24,26]. All series reported favourable outcome, independently of the adoption of one-team or two-team policy.…”
Section: Grade Of Recommendation Cmentioning
confidence: 99%