2010
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181c79990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic and Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: Expectations for Improving Oncological Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the high level of evidence supporting laparoscopic colectomy or laparoscopic rectal resection for adenocarcinoma has not been reached for laparoscopic gastrectomy [2][3][4], reports on the superiority of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer, particularly from Asian countries, are very promising [5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the high level of evidence supporting laparoscopic colectomy or laparoscopic rectal resection for adenocarcinoma has not been reached for laparoscopic gastrectomy [2][3][4], reports on the superiority of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer, particularly from Asian countries, are very promising [5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Risk factors related to anastomotic failure have been reported to be TME and multiple anastomotic stapling, which may decrease blood supply to the remaining rectum stump and increase the risk of colorectal anastomosis leakage [1]. To reduce the clinical consequences of this anastomosis failure a protective temporal ileostoma is used, but there is still debate on its clinical utility [12].Fujii and colleagues [3] looked at whether their technique, called the Y-Hood method, was safe and more effective in reducing anastomotic leak as compared with the double-stapling technique. The authors developed clamp forceps for intestinal lavage and a Y-shaped vinyl hood that can be operated under pneumoperitoneum for airproof surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors related to anastomotic failure have been reported to be TME and multiple anastomotic stapling, which may decrease blood supply to the remaining rectum stump and increase the risk of colorectal anastomosis leakage [1]. To reduce the clinical consequences of this anastomosis failure a protective temporal ileostoma is used, but there is still debate on its clinical utility [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although six randomized controlled trials of LLAR have been published, they have several limitations [1]. The oncological principles of open surgery also should be kept in mind for sphincter-saving resection: Because of a better view of the pelvis via the laparoscopic technique, a more accurate and precise TME can be achieved laparoscopically (LTME) [1,2,5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%