2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanum-modified magnetic oyster shell and its use for enhancing phosphate removal from water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The qe value that was generated from the PFO model was considerably different from the qe value that was determined from the experimental data, but the qe value that was produced from the PSO model was consistent with that from the experimental data [26]. The R 2 values varied from 0.9974 to 0.9986, and the PSO plot is made up entirely of straight lines (t/qt versus t) [27]. The R 2 values obtained from the PFO model varied from 0.4802 to 0.6913 and were lower than those obtained from the PSO.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetics For Cmcs With Various Particle Sizesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The qe value that was generated from the PFO model was considerably different from the qe value that was determined from the experimental data, but the qe value that was produced from the PSO model was consistent with that from the experimental data [26]. The R 2 values varied from 0.9974 to 0.9986, and the PSO plot is made up entirely of straight lines (t/qt versus t) [27]. The R 2 values obtained from the PFO model varied from 0.4802 to 0.6913 and were lower than those obtained from the PSO.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetics For Cmcs With Various Particle Sizesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…13,15,38,57 Although they can achieve high removal efficiency, they are complicated, difficult to operate and costly, and most phosphate effluent concentrations still fail to meet strict standards. 58 In contrast, the PAN A F–Cl is not only easy to operate, but also has low cost and can be recycled at least five times. In addition, it can reduce the phosphate effluent concentration to 0.0184 mg P L −1 , well below the 0.05 mg P L −1 emission standard recommended by Washington, D.C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH value of the solution affects not only the surface charge of the adsorbent but also the form of phosphorus in the solution 26 . Phosphate mainly exists in the forms of H 2 PO 4 − and HPO 4 2− in water when the pH is 2–10 27 . The charge on the surface of the adsorbent gradually changed from positive to negative as the pH of the solution increased, leading to an increase in the electrostatic repulsion between the adsorbent and the H 2 PO 4 − and HPO 4 2− ions, which reduced the removal rate of phosphorus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%