2009
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02830608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanum Carbonate Reduces Phosphorus Burden in Patients with CKD Stages 3 and 4

Abstract: Background and objectives: Lanthanum carbonate (FOSRENOL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
58
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with findings from prior studies of dietary phosphate restriction or phosphate binder use in CKD, which reported significant reductions in urinary phosphate excretion commensurate with the intensity of the interventions (9,13,15). Possible explanations for this lack of an effect are insufficient dietary phosphate restriction, lower doses of LC than in prior reports (15,17), withinperson variability in 24-hour urinary collections, and waning adherence with the interventions in later weeks of the study. Regardless of the mechanism, this null finding suggests that urinary phosphate may not be an ideal measure for monitoring adherence or titrating interventions aimed at reducing FGF23 levels in future interventional studies.…”
Section: Variablecontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contrasts with findings from prior studies of dietary phosphate restriction or phosphate binder use in CKD, which reported significant reductions in urinary phosphate excretion commensurate with the intensity of the interventions (9,13,15). Possible explanations for this lack of an effect are insufficient dietary phosphate restriction, lower doses of LC than in prior reports (15,17), withinperson variability in 24-hour urinary collections, and waning adherence with the interventions in later weeks of the study. Regardless of the mechanism, this null finding suggests that urinary phosphate may not be an ideal measure for monitoring adherence or titrating interventions aimed at reducing FGF23 levels in future interventional studies.…”
Section: Variablecontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…This fixed dose was chosen because it reduced urinary phosphate excretion safely and effectively in CKD stages 324 (13,15). Matching placebo was prescribed at the same frequency.…”
Section: Randomization Interventions and Adherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In physiologic studies of healthy humans, circulating FGF23 levels rose after 3-5 days of dietary phosphate loading in the absence of a significant increase in serum phosphate. [33][34][35] 40,41 Interventions that substantially lower dietary phosphate absorption typically 30,42,43 but not always 31,44 result in reductions in 24-hour urinary phosphate excretion, which may be detected even while serum phosphate levels remain unchanged. Inability to collect complete 24-hour urine collections or waning compliance with the interventions may complicate interpretation of 24-hour urinary phosphate data.…”
Section: Targeting Dietary Phosphate Absorption To Modify Phosphate Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a concern that calcium preparations may induce hypercalcemia and accelerate ectopic calcification, even in nondialysis-dependent CKD (15,16). The efficacy of noncalcium-containing phosphate binders, such as sevelamer and lanthanum, has been confirmed for this indication (17,18); however, sevelamer must be taken in large quantities to achieve adequate efficacy and is commonly associated with gastrointestinal side effects, such as constipation and bloating (19). Lanthanum accumulation in bone and other tissues has also been observed, although no safety issues related to tissue accumulation have been identified so far (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%