2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanide-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks Containing “V-Shaped” Tetracarboxylate Ligands: Synthesis, Crystal Structures, “Naked-Eye” Luminescent Detection, and Catalytic Properties

Abstract: Three lanthanide-based metal–organic frameworks, [Tb­(HMDIA)­(H2O)3]·H2O (Tb-MDIA), [Ho­(HMDIA)­(H2O)3]·(H2O)2 (Ho-MDIA), and [Nd­(HMDIA)­(H2O)3]·(H2O)2 (Nd-MDIA) from the same V-shaped ligand 5,5′-methylenediisophthalic acid (H4MDIA), were prepared by mixing Ln3+ and H4MDIA under solvothermal conditions. The crystal structures of the three complexes were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The different coordination modes of the organic ligands resulted in different framework structures among the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tb−O bond distances are in the range of 2.284(13)−2.539(15) Å, which are comparable to those in the reported terbium−oxygen donor compounds in the literature. 19,38 All carboxylic groups in the deprotonated bcbp ligand take a bidentate bridging coordination mode, which is also called the Harris notation [4.1111] coordination mode (Figure S1). 66 The neighboring Tb1 and Tb2 ions are connected through three bidentate bridging carboxylate groups, forming a T-shaped Tb 2 (bcbp) 3 unit (Figure S2a).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Tb−O bond distances are in the range of 2.284(13)−2.539(15) Å, which are comparable to those in the reported terbium−oxygen donor compounds in the literature. 19,38 All carboxylic groups in the deprotonated bcbp ligand take a bidentate bridging coordination mode, which is also called the Harris notation [4.1111] coordination mode (Figure S1). 66 The neighboring Tb1 and Tb2 ions are connected through three bidentate bridging carboxylate groups, forming a T-shaped Tb 2 (bcbp) 3 unit (Figure S2a).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past several decades, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based on metal nodes and organic linkers have attracted much attention owing to their fascinating and tailorable structures and properties. MOFs have shown numerous potential applications including gas sorption and separation, energy storage and conversion, , luminescent sensors, catalysis, biomedicine, carbon dioxide capture and fixation, and so on. As a subclass of MOFs, cationic MOFs featuring positively charged frameworks are capable of some specific applications such as gas adsorption and separation, colorimetric sensing, and pollutant sensing and removal, including inorganic oxo anions and organic anionic dyes. However, cationic MOFs have been rarely reported, because the design and synthesis of cationic MOFs are still difficult and challenging. Usually, the choice of metal ions, counteranions, organic ligands, and solvents plays an important role in the construction of cationic MOFs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a promising class of porous materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have caught considerable attention because of their tunability and diversity in structures and properties during the past decades. High surface areas and tailorable pores of MOF materials endow them with many appealing applications, such as gas storage and separation, catalysis, in magnets, luminescence and sensing, and so forth. As a subclass of MOFs, cationic metal–organic frameworks (CMOFs), which possess positive networks, are advantageous in several particular applications including but not limited to colorimetric sensing, ion chromatography, water purification, and anionic pollutant removal. Compared with neutral MOFs, CMOFs are rarely reported due to the formidable complexity and challenge for their syntheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cage-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), also known as metal–organic polyhedral frameworks, which inherit the advantage of MOF materials, have gained significant popularity owing to their well-defined cavities and high stabilities, which endow cage-based MOFs with outstanding performances in the applications of gas storage/separation, heterogeneous catalysis, water purification, chemical sensing, chemical nanoreaction, drug delivery, and so on . By virtue of the relatively mature synthetic strategies, such as face- and edge-directed methods, multiple cage-based MOFs have been constructed by employing the well-defined molecular building blocks with appropriate geometries .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%