LANL experience with coregistration of MTI imagery

Pope, Paul A.; Theiler, James; Galbraith, Amy E.

doi:10.1117/12.509855

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pope et al (2004) has explained the LANL (Los Angels National Laboratory) experiences with Coregistration of MTI images. Theiler et al (2002) has also done a study for estimating the effect of various errors for MTI spectral bands.…”

Section: Factors Affecting Staggermentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre-processing considerations of IRS-P6 LISS-4 imagery

Radhadevi¹,

Solanki²,

Ramchandran³

et al. 2008

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Factors Affecting Staggermentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre-processing considerations of IRS-P6 LISS-4 imagery

Radhadevi¹,

Solanki²,

Ramchandran³

et al. 2008

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…They have also reported the automated image registration of MTI imagery through entirely image-based methods. Initially these two approaches were developed as parallel methods for co-registration and later they were combined into a more hybrid approach (Pope et al, 2003). Co-registration and in-flight calibration updates * Corresponding author.…”

Section: Co-registration Schemesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automated co-registration of images from multiple bands of Liss-4 camera

Radhadevi¹,

Solanki²,

Jyothi³

et al. 2009

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, a number of co-registration techniques have been described in professional literature. In particular, the MTI program has experimented with four techniques 9 . The experiences and insights provided by the MTI program are likely common to most other pushbroom coregistration efforts.…”

Section: Focal Plane Considerations and Expectationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geopositional accuracy evaluation of QuickBird ortho-ready standard 2A multispectral imagery

Ager

Jamison²,

Bresnahan³

et al. 2004

SPIE Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The NGA has initiated a program to evaluate high resolution commercial sensors developed by Space Imaging, DigitalGlobe, Orbimage and others. Recent evaluations have involved QuickBird panchromatic products including the Basic 1B, Ortho-Ready Standard 2A, orthorectified, and Basic Stereo Pair products. This paper presents the results of an additional geo-positional accuracy evaluation of multispectral QuickBird Ortho-Ready Standard 2A images. These products were compared to a globally distributed set of Ground Control Points (GCPs), and the calculated geo-positional accuracy was compared to the published QuickBird specifications and to the panchromatic Ortho-Ready Standard 2A product. The results of the panchromatic and multispectral bands are compared, and the band-to-band registration of the multispectral arrays is evaluated.

show abstract

LANL experience with coregistration of MTI imagery

Cited by 7 publications

References 9 publications

Pre-processing considerations of IRS-P6 LISS-4 imagery

Pre-processing considerations of IRS-P6 LISS-4 imagery

Automated co-registration of images from multiple bands of Liss-4 camera

Geopositional accuracy evaluation of QuickBird ortho-ready standard 2A multispectral imagery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About