Languishing in the crossroad? A scoping review of intersectional inequalities in mental health

Abstract

The concept of intersectionality has gradually been introduced to health inequality research, adding depth and breadth to the way inequalities in health are approached. We conducted a scoping review with the purpose to systematically map, describe and analyze the literature about intersectional inequalities in mental health. For eligibility, the study had to analyze and report inequality defined by combinations of socioeconomic position, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation or religion. The mental health outcome had to be measured as self-reported symptoms assessed through validated scales, or disorders assessed through diagnostic interviews. The search strategy was applied in two databases and the screening process yielded 20 studies. The interaction of intersectional positions showed no consistent patterns in mental health across studies, but both synergistic and antagonistic effects were observed. In most studies an absolute measure of inequality was used and few studies analyzed factors potentially explaining the intersectional inequalities. Taken together, the findings of this review highlight the value of assessing intersectional inequalities across population groups for priority setting and action on mental health inequalities. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-019-1012-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

What is intersectionality and why is it important in oral health research?

“…Other health disciplines have advanced intersectionality research, including medicine, 66 nursing, 67 psychology, 68 and psychiatry and mental health 69,70 . This work provides important learning opportunities for oral health research.…”

Navigating Cultures: Narratives of Becoming Among Young Refugees in Norway

“…Health inequalities have been examined along dimensions such as geographical location, income, education, occupation, gender, ethnicity, race, caste, and more (Arcaya, Arcaya, & Subramanian, 2015). Intersectionality has gradually been introduced into research on health inequalities as a way of understanding the complexity and interactions between different social dimensions (Fagrell Trygg, Gustafsson, & Månsdotter, 2019). The central idea of intersectionality is that many intersecting and interacting axes of social division shape how power is distributed in a society.…”

Relationships between Physical and Mental Health in Adolescents from Low-Income, Rural Communities: Univariate and Multivariate Analyses

“…Evidence regarding the impact of SES on mental health status has been mixed, possibly due to the fact that it may interact with factors, such as race, to create individualized experiences and perspectives. Indeed, intersectionality theory proposes that demographic factors, including sex, race/ethnicity, SES, and culture interact to form individualized experiences and perspectives which contribute to differences in mental health attitudes, access, and service use [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. One literature review suggested that low SES was associated with greater self-reported internalizing mental health problems among adolescents [ 23 ], however, data from a national survey found no relationship between SES and internalizing diagnoses [ 7 ].…”