Handbook of Formal Languages 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59126-6_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Languages, Automata, and Logic

Abstract: This paper is a survey on logical aspects of nite automata. Central points are the connection between nite automata and monadic second-order logic, the Ehrenfeucht-Fra ss e t e c hnique in the context of formal language theory, nite automata on !-words and their determinization, and a self-contained proof of the \Rabin Tree Theorem".Sections 5 and 6 contain material presented in a lecture series to the \Final Winter School of AMICS" (Palermo, February 1996). A modi ed version of the paper will be a chapter of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
601
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 733 publications
(615 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
601
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using standard techniques for translating automata to logic (cf. [Tho97]), one describes in WMSO that the corresponding tuple of finite trees is accepted by the automaton.…”
Section: Automatic-like Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using standard techniques for translating automata to logic (cf. [Tho97]), one describes in WMSO that the corresponding tuple of finite trees is accepted by the automaton.…”
Section: Automatic-like Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We specifically consider reachability, safety, Büchi, coBüchi, and parity objectives, all of them Borel measurable. The parity objectives are a canonical form to express all ω-regular objectives [21]. For a play π = ℓ 0 σ 0 ℓ 1 .…”
Section: Alg For ω-Regular Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us list some fundamental and well-known properties of k-types for any of the logics L above; here we suppress the reference to L for simplicity of notation. The proofs of these facts can be found in several sources, we mention [12,18,19] for MSO and FO, and [13] for FO[<]+MOD.…”
Section: Logical Background and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While H supplies information about the infinite occurrence of certain segment types, FO[S]-sentences can only express such occurrences in numbers up to a certain finite bound. Indeed, it is well-known that the FO-theory of M = (N, S, P ) is decidable iff for each isomorphism type τ of finite segments and each m, one can decide whether τ occurs ≥ m times in M (see, e.g., [16,19]). …”
Section: The Successor Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%