2017
DOI: 10.7146/hjlcb.v23i44.97329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Use and Communication in an International Management Setting: The Power to Misrecognize

Abstract: Linguistic and cultural differences have often been conceived as the main obstacles when communicating in international business settings. While acknowledging that such differences are of great importance, this article goes one step further in investigating the role of intercultural communication in international management settings. Hence, it is our argument that more focus should be directed at group processes within the organization. Based on a short illustrative case of a Danish subsidiary in China, it is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In international business settings, intercultural distinctions are often perceived as obstacles in negotiating and developing a fruitful trade partnership. Therefore, this topic relates particularly to education and training and thus the learning of cross-cultural skills, solutions and international business communication [82][83][84][85][86]. In our investigation, this issue plays an important role in the customersupplier relationship, discussed in Section 4.2.3.…”
Section: Survey Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In international business settings, intercultural distinctions are often perceived as obstacles in negotiating and developing a fruitful trade partnership. Therefore, this topic relates particularly to education and training and thus the learning of cross-cultural skills, solutions and international business communication [82][83][84][85][86]. In our investigation, this issue plays an important role in the customersupplier relationship, discussed in Section 4.2.3.…”
Section: Survey Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 91%