1983
DOI: 10.2307/413380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic verbal structure is a structure that uses a verb as a predicate, while the basic nonverbal structure is a structure that does not use a verb as a predicate. This phenomenon can be found in many languages worldwide [12], [13]. The data above shows that the basic structure of the BHL clauses can be transitive and intransitive verbs.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The basic verbal structure is a structure that uses a verb as a predicate, while the basic nonverbal structure is a structure that does not use a verb as a predicate. This phenomenon can be found in many languages worldwide [12], [13]. The data above shows that the basic structure of the BHL clauses can be transitive and intransitive verbs.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…From a morphological typological perspective, languages in the archipelago, such as Old Balinese, Old Javanese and Modern Balinese, are characterized by agglutination typology. One of the characteristics of agglutinative is that one word can be formed by more than one morpheme and the boundary between morphemes and words is clear (see Comrie, 1989;Lieber, 2010). However, when compared with Sanskrit, Balinese as well as Old Javanese are very contrastive languages.…”
Section: Introduction a Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] Comrie divides it into three categories: formal commonality and substantive commonality, containing commonality and non-inclusion commonality, absolute commonality and inclination. [3] There are usually four root causes of language commonality: natural ability, pragmatic function, cognitive psychology and diachronic development. [4] For the latter Bybee believes that diachronic commonality is the law of linguistic evolution, which determines both the possibility of evolution and the directionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%