1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(09)60136-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language, Thought, and Culture: Toward a Mergence of Diverging Problem Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it turned out that the participants who declared high certainty of their standpoint before engaging in a dialogue had a significantly lower level of integrative attitude than participants who were less certain of theirs. This result, supported by the already cited views presented by Rokeach (1960) and the continuators of his thought (Ertel, 1986;Johnson, 2010;Zinczuk-Zielazna & Obrębska, 2016) makes it legitimate to conclude that high certainty of the validity of one's standpoint may often mask anxiety, which is supposed to be reduced by the avoidance of potentially threatening contents. In consequence, this kind of certainty cannot be conducive to openness to the interlocutor's arguments or willingness to change one's views (even to some extent).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, it turned out that the participants who declared high certainty of their standpoint before engaging in a dialogue had a significantly lower level of integrative attitude than participants who were less certain of theirs. This result, supported by the already cited views presented by Rokeach (1960) and the continuators of his thought (Ertel, 1986;Johnson, 2010;Zinczuk-Zielazna & Obrębska, 2016) makes it legitimate to conclude that high certainty of the validity of one's standpoint may often mask anxiety, which is supposed to be reduced by the avoidance of potentially threatening contents. In consequence, this kind of certainty cannot be conducive to openness to the interlocutor's arguments or willingness to change one's views (even to some extent).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In his opinion, the cognitive aspect of dogmatism is characterized by attributes such as rigid certainty, intolerance of ambiguity, and defensive cognitive closure. Analyzing the manifestations of dogmatic thinking at the level of language, Ertel (1986) also associates this mechanisms, among other things, with words from the certainty category (e.g., certainly, undoubtedly, obviously). Likewise, Zinczuk-Zielazna and Obrębska (2016) found that individuals with a high level of anxiety (conscious or repressed) used phrases interpreted in the literature as expressions of dogmatism in thinking -including words from the certainty categorysignificantly more often than low-anxiety individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, included in the mode of content analysis (Smith, 1996;van Dijk, 1997), consists in counting appropriately selected language elements taken from samples of the studied narratives (Baker, 2006;Kurcz, 2005;Pennebaker, 2007; see also Fairclough, 2001, Reisigl & Wodak, 2009. Changes in the frequency of these elements usually indicate changes in the beliefs of their authors (Ertel, 1972(Ertel, , 1986. In our case, it was not just samples of texts that were considered (selected samples/fragments of the epistles and gospels), but the entire text collections were studied (all epistles and gospels) in order to increase the reliability of the obtained results.…”
Section: Methods Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of indicators is based on the assumption that "with regard to superfi cial expression, more frequent use of a particular class of expressions in comparison to contrasting expressions reveal certain ways of thinking and perception of reality, known as cognitive styles" (Kurcz 1992, p. 294). In this case, I used three indicators, referring in part to the work of the German linguistic-cultural psychologist Suitbert Ertel, who in the 70s and 80s developed a set of indicators to be used in the study of written texts (these indicators allowed him to capture changes in thinking and cognitive perception of the world present in the structure of a text -Ertel, 1986). Jesus' Sermon on the Mount was subjected to three -appropriately modifi ed -indicators: impersonal narrative references, abstractness and dogmatism.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Jesus Christ's Sermon On the Mount mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this indicator, E. Ertel was able to mark, e.g. distinct changes in its value by analyzing texts of J. Kant before and during the process of writing The Critique of Pure Reason, and also in the German press before and after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 (Ertel, 1986).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Jesus Christ's Sermon On the Mount mentioning
confidence: 99%