2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
195
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
18
195
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of infants development of the perception of prosodic contrasts generally, our findings place the perception of broad and narrow focus prosody along a similar path to that found for stress-based contrasts (Jusczyk et al, 1993;Höhle et al, 2009;Skoruppa et al, 2009;Skoruppa et al, 2011;Skoruppa et al, 2013), and unlike that of lexical pitch accent and lexical tone (Mattock & Burnham, 2006;Mattock et al, 2008;Sato et al, 2009;Yeung et al, 2013), as well as intonation contrasts based on pitch height and pitch direction . These results suggest that infants' abilities to perceive a prosodic contrast are dependent on the types of acoustic cues that define the contrast.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the context of infants development of the perception of prosodic contrasts generally, our findings place the perception of broad and narrow focus prosody along a similar path to that found for stress-based contrasts (Jusczyk et al, 1993;Höhle et al, 2009;Skoruppa et al, 2009;Skoruppa et al, 2011;Skoruppa et al, 2013), and unlike that of lexical pitch accent and lexical tone (Mattock & Burnham, 2006;Mattock et al, 2008;Sato et al, 2009;Yeung et al, 2013), as well as intonation contrasts based on pitch height and pitch direction . These results suggest that infants' abilities to perceive a prosodic contrast are dependent on the types of acoustic cues that define the contrast.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…a single token with contrasting prosodic realizations) are found for the broad/narrow focus distinction, similarly to findings for stress (Friederici, Friedrich, & Christophe, 2007;Höhle et al, 2009;Skoruppa et al, 2013), whereas results for lexical pitch accent or intonation contrasts based on pitch height/direction show that early discrimination abilities are not hindered by phonetic variability (Nazzi, Floccia & Bertoncini, 1998;Sato et al, 2009;Frota et al, 2014). In order to ascertain how stimuli complexity affects early perceptual abilities, further research is required with intonation contrasts, and also lexical pitch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the experimental results of Jusczyk, Houston, and Newsome (1999) revealed more than a decade ago, American babies of 7.5 months showed an exquisite sensitivity to the predominant trochaic stress pattern in English called as trochaic bias. However, a decade later, results of a cross-linguistic study (Höhle, Bijeljac-Babic, Herold, Weissenborn, & Nazzi, 2009) revealed an earlier emergence of this bias in German infants as compared to French ones. The first electrophysiological studies on infants' automatic detection of trochaic pattern revealed discriminative abilities below the age of 6 months as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experimental studies have shown that newborn infants detect prosodic cues in language (Sambeth, Ruohio, Alku et al, 2008), discriminate between familiar and novel voices (Kisilevsky, Hains, Lee et al, 2003), attend to and produce intonation and rhythmic characteristics of the ambient language (Hohle, Bijeljac-Babic, Herold et al, 2009;Mampe, Friederici, Christophe et al, 2009). …”
Section: Speech Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%