Language socialization and interculturality: address terms in intergenerational talk in Chinese diasporic families

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the current debate on 'interculturality' (IC) by investigating the process of language socialization whereby different generations of diasporic families negotiate, construct, and renew their sociocultural values and identities through interaction. Focusing on the use of address terms and 'talk about social, cultural, and linguistic practice,' the paper argues that IC is not only a dynamic process through which participants make aspects of their multiple and shifting identities relevant, but also a process of developing new social and cultural identities. In effect, it serves as a direct means of language socialization for the younger generation who are developing their sociocultural roles and learning about the social and cultural appropriateness of behavior in a diasporic context, where there are potentially substantial differences in social and cultural values between the wider local community and the diasporic community. Language socialization is regarded in this study as not simply about passing social and cultural values from one generation to another, but about bringing about changes in social and cultural values. Through language socialization, the younger generations of diasporic communities not only internalize the social, cultural and linguistic norms of their community, but also play an active role in constructing and creating their own social and cultural identities as well as bringing about changes to the existing community and family norms.'interculturality'

Call me Fei: Chinese-speaking students’ decision whether or not to use English names in classroom interaction

“…give English names to children, often at birth, with no specific expectation of them going on to use English or live abroad (Hua, 2010). Henry (2012)…”

“…Less attention still has been paid to the minority of Chinese speakers who do not take on English names during their studies in English. The names chosen for use during interaction are, though, both significant and meaningful, symbolising the social and cultural membership speakers would like to evoke (Hua, 2010), and impacting on the student-teacher relationship. It is therefore necessary to understand why Chinese-speaking students choose to/not to use English names during their studies in English.…”

Interculturality as social capital at work: The case of disagreements in American-Japanese interaction

“…Additionally, scholars are interested in uncovering the beneficial ways that international workers mobilize their ‘interculturality’ (e.g. Mori 2003; Ryoo 2005; Hua 2010). This work contrasts with traditional views of interculturality that use differences in sociocultural backgrounds as an explanation for observed interactional patterns—an approach that has been critiqued for imposing cultural differences even when participants render them irrelevant within actual interaction (Nishizaka 1995).…”

A Qualitative Exploration of Post-Migration Family Dynamics and Intergenerational Relationships

“…Galvin, Braithwaite, and Bylund (2015) notes that this leaves little room to review and/or reconstruct (if needed) the ways in which the family interacts and the roles and responsibilities of individual family members (Moskal, 2011). While many migrant families develop strategies for managing this change process (Renzaho, McCabe, & Sainsbury, 2011), others experience family breakdown (Herrman, Kaplan, & Szwarc, 2010) and intergenerational conflict (Phinney, Ong, & Madden, 2000) with lasting effects on all family members and their relationships (Hua, 2010).…”