Language, Sex, and Luther: Feminist Observations

Abstract

Reading Luther from a feminist perspective reveals paradoxes and ambiguities in Luther's writings related to language and sex, but we cannot make sense of Luther without important historical information, particularly the history of the meaning of sex; it affords a fresh reading of Luther. Even while Luther reinforces male-identified language and symbolism, he begins to shift it, and his work offers clues relevant to theological dialogue on the androcentrism of the Christian tradition 500 years into the ongoing reformation of Christianity. Because of the power dynamics infused in Western accounts of sex, gender, and sexuality for humans, Christians cannot in good faith cling to a primary gender or sex identity for God. More careful English translations demonstrate Luther is a resource in this work because he begins to shift an androcentric view of God and humanity even while paradoxically repeating it. Previous English translations of Luther have obscured his shifts in language and imagery and thus have led English readers to misunderstand Luther's subtle but powerful views.

Women in Society Through the Aspect of Language

“…Language is defined to act as a semiotic tool that demonstrates knowledge and values (Malinowska, 2020). It creates a sense of social interaction; hence language plays a vital role in this social life (Alvanoudi, 2018;Streufert, 2020). Commonly, the Greek and Indo-European languages have two or three class systems in which the nouns of gender for representing humans are referred to concerning the sex of a person (Streufert, 2020).…”

“…It creates a sense of social interaction; hence language plays a vital role in this social life (Alvanoudi, 2018;Streufert, 2020). Commonly, the Greek and Indo-European languages have two or three class systems in which the nouns of gender for representing humans are referred to concerning the sex of a person (Streufert, 2020). Language and women have been studied in psycholinguistics, cognitive and social psychology (Koch et al, 2022).…”